Search for: "Christian Louboutin S.A. v. Yves Saint Laurent America Inc" Results 1 - 20 of 21
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Aug 2018, 3:11 pm by Afro Leo
  A happy outcome in the United States was the decision here  in Christian Louboutin S.A. v Yves Saint Laurent America Inc., No. 11-3303 (2d Cir. 2012) 1 ‘…the Red Sole Mark has acquired limited secondary meaning as a distinctive symbol that identifies the Louboutin brand, and…it is therefore a valid and protectable mark…’ (page 25) here.A second problem featured in… [read post]
6 Sep 2017, 8:00 am by Tucker Chambers
As another example, in Christian Louboutin, S.A. v. [read post]
6 Sep 2017, 8:00 am by Tucker Chambers
As another example, in Christian Louboutin, S.A. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 12:04 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  The most striking example of apparently mistaken incontestability comes from B&B v. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 7:11 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Yves Saint Laurent America Holding, Inc., No. 11-3303-cv (2d Cir. [read post]
20 Sep 2012, 1:13 pm by paperstreet
Yves Saint Laurent America Holding, Inc., No. 11-33-3-cv. (2nd Cir. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 10:12 am
Yves Saint Laurent America Holding, Inc., 778 F.Supp.2d 445 (S.D.N.Y. 2011) (No. 11-3303). [read post]