Search for: "Christian v. United States" Results 1 - 20 of 1,711
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Apr 2025, 11:42 pm by Frank Cranmer
Regular readers will recall R (Harrison & Ors) v Secretary of State for Justice [2020] EWHC 2096 (Admin), in which the claimants argued that the fact that legal recognition of religious wedding ceremonies under English law did not extend to weddings carried out in accordance with their humanist beliefs discriminated against them unjustifiably and breached their Convention rights under Article 9 ECHR. [read post]
1 Apr 2025, 9:36 am by Erin Lynch
Today, C-sections are common interventions, accounting for approximately one-third of births in the United States. [read post]
1 Apr 2025, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
” The societies for the suppression of vice did not stamp out opposition or convince Americans to modify their intimate lives, but their idea of sexual purity did gain traction in the courts, culminating in the 1896 decision of United States v. [read post]
11 Mar 2025, 4:41 pm by Chris Castle
  ARI Comment in IPO Consultation v F 2Download [read post]
25 Feb 2025, 6:36 am by Marcia Coyle
Catholic Charities and the solicitor general of the United States argue that the state court was wrong in its analysis of what the state law requires. [read post]
11 Feb 2025, 9:08 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
United States Department of Homeland Security et al., was filed in federal district court in Washington, DC . [read post]
7 Feb 2025, 1:48 pm by Chris Williams
Sounds like something a man named Jesus might do. pic.twitter.com/37gkhMzfmc— Sis (@ResisterSis20) January 22, 2025While the United States has no state language or religion, you don’t have to live here long to know that they are English and Christianity, respectively. [read post]
29 Jan 2025, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In support of its argument that NJT was an "arm of the state" entitled to invoke sovereign immunity, defendants cited a decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit holding that NJT is entitled to invoke sovereign immunity in federal court (see Karns v Shanahan, 879 F3d 504, 519 [3d Cir 2018]). [read post]
29 Jan 2025, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In support of its argument that NJT was an "arm of the state" entitled to invoke sovereign immunity, defendants cited a decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit holding that NJT is entitled to invoke sovereign immunity in federal court (see Karns v Shanahan, 879 F3d 504, 519 [3d Cir 2018]). [read post]