Search for: "Christiansburg Garment Co. v. EEOC"
Results 1 - 20
of 40
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 May 2015, 8:00 am
In exercising this discretion, courts must follow the rule set forth in Christiansburg Garment Co. v. [read post]
19 May 2016, 8:13 am
” Christiansburg Garment Co. v. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 6:52 am
The Court in its 1978 decision Christiansburg Garment Co. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 7:20 am
Under the Supreme Court’s decision in Christiansburg Garment Co. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 8:06 am
The Court’s 1978 decision in Christiansburg Garment Co. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 11:04 am
In relevant part, Christiansburg Garment Co. v. [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 6:32 am
Citing the longstanding case of Christiansburg Garment Co. v. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 2:28 pm
In relevant part, Christiansburg Garment Co. v. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 2:28 pm
In relevant part, Christiansburg Garment Co. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 1:21 pm
The Eighth Circuit also held that CRST could not satisfy the standard of Christianburg Garment Co. v. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 3:00 pm
(quoting Christiansburg Garment Co. v. [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 1:50 pm
” The Eighth Circuit also held that CRST could not satisfy the standard of Christianburg Garment Co. v. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 7:10 am
Supreme Court’s holding in Christiansburg Garment Co. v. [read post]
8 May 2011, 7:31 pm
Peoplemark, Inc., the Court in Tricore applied the well-established standard from Christiansburg Garment Co. v. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 7:39 am
Citing the longstanding case of Christiansburg Garment Co. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 10:28 am
The statute makes no distinction between the standard for prevailing plaintiffs versus prevailing defendants, but in Christiansburg Garment Co. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 5:09 am
However, an award of attorneys' fees to a prevailing defendant is appropriate in much more limited circumstances.In Christiansburg Garment Co. v. [read post]
19 May 2016, 7:24 pm
In Christiansburg Garment Co. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 10:44 am
Supreme Court entitled Christiansburg Garment Co. v. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 7:29 am
The appeals court declined to consider the EEOC’s contention that the laches defense, which had won the day for the employer in the district court, should not be applied in actions brought by federal agencies, and that it would be “unjust” to award attorneys’ fees incurred in pursuit of that defense (EEOC v Propak Logistics, Inc, March 25, 2014, Keenan, B). [read post]
