Search for: "Christiansburg Garment Co. v. EEOC" Results 1 - 20 of 44
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Mar 2016, 6:52 am by Ross Runkel
The Court in its 1978 decision Christiansburg Garment Co. v. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 2:10 pm by Epstein Becker & Green
It had long been argued by attorneys representing employees in these types of cases that Section 218.5 should be interpreted to mean that a prevailing employer would only be entitled to its fees if the employee’s suit was found to be frivolous, unreasonable, or without foundation – a standard announced in Christiansburg Garment Co. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 8:06 am by Ross Runkel
The Court’s 1978 decision in Christiansburg Garment Co. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 1:21 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  The Eighth Circuit also held that CRST could not satisfy the standard of Christianburg Garment Co. v. [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 1:50 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
”   The Eighth Circuit also held that CRST could not satisfy the standard of Christianburg Garment Co. v. [read post]
8 May 2011, 7:31 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Peoplemark, Inc., the Court in Tricore applied the well-established standard from Christiansburg Garment Co. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 10:28 am by Mack Sperling
  The statute makes no distinction between the standard for prevailing plaintiffs versus prevailing defendants, but in Christiansburg Garment Co. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 5:09 am by Dr. Jillian T. Weiss
However, an award of attorneys' fees to a prevailing defendant is appropriate in much more limited circumstances.In Christiansburg Garment Co. v. [read post]