Search for: "Christiansburg Garment Co. v. EEOC" Results 21 - 39 of 39
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 May 2016, 5:40 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  First, CRST argued that the Eighth Circuit’s rule that a prevailing defendant may recover fees only when a case is decided “on the merits” has no basis in the statute, conflicts with Christiansburg Garment Co. v. [read post]
23 May 2016, 8:26 am by Joy Waltemath
“The congressional policy regarding the exercise of district court discretion in the ultimate decision whether to award fees does not distinguish between merits-based and nonmerits-based judgments,” the Court stated, noting that as it explained in Christiansburg Garment Co. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 6:02 am
Supreme Court's decision in Christiansburg Garment Co. v. [read post]
20 May 2016, 1:54 pm by Kathy Kapusta
“The congressional policy regarding the exercise of district court discretion in the ultimate decision whether to award fees does not distinguish between merits-based and nonmerits-based judgments,” the Court stated, noting that as it explained in Christiansburg Garment Co. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 12:24 pm by Richard Renner
The majority's opinion is not quite long enough to cite Christiansburg Garment Co. v. [read post]
8 May 2014, 9:21 am by Gene Quinn
We have twice declined to construe fee-shifting provisions narrowly on the basis that doing so would render them superfluous, given the background exception to the American rule, see Christiansburg Garment Co. v. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 8:51 am by Andrew Frisch
“The court in such action shall, in addition to any judgment awarded to the plaintiff or plaintiffs, allow a reasonable attorney’s fee to be paid by the defendant, and costs of the action.” 29 U.S.C. § 216(b) (emphasis added); Christiansburg Garment Co. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 8:12 am by John Elwood
Wisconsin, 15-214, escaped fate as fodder for a dissent from denial of cert.; the case asks whether two legally distinct but commonly owned contiguous parcels can be combined for regulatory takings analysis under Penn Central Transportation Co. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 9:37 am by Brian Wolfman
Taniguchi cites the Court’s landmark ruling in Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. [read post]