Search for: "Christopher v. SmithKline Beecham Corp" Results 61 - 80 of 97
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
U.S. Supreme Court Rules Against OT Pay for Pharmaceutical Salespeople
25 Jun 2012, 7:08 am by Mitchell Boyarsky
The Court’s holding in Christopher v. [read post]
Employment Law Alert - http://www.employmentlawalert.com
San Francisco Federal Court Rules that Hershey Company Employees Helping Stores Sell More Chocolate Entitled to Overtime.
27 Feb 2011, 12:26 pm
SmithKline Beecham Corp. (9th Circuit, February 14, 2011), reviewed elsewhere in this blog. [read post]
San Francisco Overtime Attorney Blog - http://www.sanfranciscoovertimeattorneysblog.com/
If At First You Don't Succeed....Your "Plan B" Will Probably Fail, Too
10 Aug 2011, 1:51 pm by Todd Dawson
SmithKline Beecham Corp., 635 F.3d 383 (9th Cir. 2011) and the unavailability of the FLSA's administrative exemption, pharmaceutical companies will remain somewhat in limbo as to whether they may appropriately treat such employees as exempt. [read post]
Employment Class Action Blog - http://www.employmentclassactionreport.com/
Updated: Details on today’s grants
28 Nov 2011, 7:50 am by Kali Borkoski
SmithKline Beecham Corp. [read post]
SCOTUSblog - http://www.scotusblog.com/
Thursday round-up
1 Dec 2011, 6:25 am by Kiran Bhat
SmithKline Beecham Corp. [read post]
SCOTUSblog - http://www.scotusblog.com/
9th Cir.: Group Home Housing “Severely Emotionally Disturbed” Children Not An “Institution Primarily Engaged in the Care of the Sick, the Aged, Mentally Ill”
25 Jun 2011, 6:55 am by Andrew Frisch
SmithKline Beecham Corp., this decision is particularly disturbing. [read post]
Overtime Law Blog | FLSA Decisions - http://overtimelaw.wordpress.com
Latest PHH v. CFPB Ruling Brings RESPA and CFPB Enforcement Approaches Back in Focus
27 Feb 2018, 8:27 am by Elizabeth A. Khalil
Citing the US Supreme Court case of Christopher v. [read post]
NextGen Financial Services Report - http://www.nextgenfinancialservicesreport.com/
The Discretion to Formulate Business Strategies Remains Critical to the Status of Pharmaceutical Sales Representatives
5 Dec 2011, 8:59 am by Kara M. Maciel
SmithKline Beecham Corp., for example, rejected the argument that pharmaceutical sales representatives did not qualify for the Outside Sales exemption. [read post]
Wage & Hour Defense Blog - http://www.wagehourblog.com/
U.S. Supreme Court rules drug reps are exempt as “outside salesmen”
18 Jun 2012, 12:49 pm by Washington Employment Law Letter
SmithKline Beecham Corp. dba GlaxoSmithKline, Case No. 11-204 (June 18, 2012). [read post]
Human Resources News - http://employmentlawpost.com/hrnews
Close Counts in Horseshoes, Hand Grenades and Sales: Supreme Court Holds Pharmaceutical Representatives Exempt Under FLSA
21 Jun 2012, 6:33 am by John T. McDonald
 Thus, such employees are not entitled to overtime protection.In Christopher v. [read post]
Employment Law Watch - http://www.employmentlawwatch.com/
Federal Circuit En Banc Patent Decisions
8 Mar 2011, 1:23 pm by Jason Rantanen
Cir. 2006) (en banc in part) SmithKline Beecham Corp. v. [read post]
Patently-O - http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/
Who Heeds The Heeding Presumption?
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp., 952 F. [read post]
Drug and Device Law - http://druganddevicelaw.blogspot.com/
Special Report: A quick and dirty on this week's "drug rep" overtime decision . . . and why all employers should be pleased
19 Jun 2012, 12:46 pm by Robin E. Shea
SmithKline Beecham Corp., which held that pharmaceutical reps are subject to the "outside sales" exemption to the overtime requirements of the Fair Labor Standards Act. [read post]
Employment & Labor Insider - http://www.employmentandlaborinsider.com/
The Discretion to Formulate Business Strategies Remains Critical to the Status of Pharmaceutical Sales Representatives Continue Reading…
5 Dec 2011, 8:59 am by <a href=''>Kara M. Maciel</a>
SmithKline Beecham Corp., for example, rejected the argument that pharmaceutical sales representatives did not qualify for the Outside Sales exemption. [read post]
Wage & Hour Defense Blog - http://www.wagehourblog.com/
Monday Morning Regulatory Review – 4/16/12
15 Apr 2012, 10:15 pm by Leland E. Beck
SmithKline Beecham Corp. [read post]
Federal Regulations Advisor - http://www.fedregsadvisor.com/
ACE as Overlord
14 Jul 2019, 5:03 pm by Larry
SmithKline Beecham Corp., 567 US 142, 155 (2012) which was further quoting Bowen v. [read post]
Customs Law - http://customslaw.blogspot.com/
U.S. Supreme Court Holds Agency Interpretations Are Not Subject To Notice-and-Comment Rulemaking Requirement
16 Mar 2015, 10:41 am by Marlene Nicolas and Karina Layugan
SmithKline Beecham Corp., 567 U. [read post]
Labor & Employment Law Blog - http://www.laboremploymentlawblog.com/
To Sell or Not to Sell: Justices Split on Exemption
16 Apr 2012, 12:50 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
SmithKline Beecham Corp. d/b/a GlaxoSmithKline. [read post]
The Wage and Hour Litigation Blog - http://www.wagehourlitigation.com
Symposium: Auer deference — Supreme Court chooses evolution, not revolution
27 Jun 2019, 8:36 am by Ronald Levin
SmithKline Beecham Corp. [read post]
SCOTUSblog - http://www.scotusblog.com/
By the numbers: Update on OT11 and the first Stat Pack
13 Dec 2011, 12:00 pm by Kedar Bhatia
SmithKline Beecham Corp. [read post]
SCOTUSblog - http://www.scotusblog.com/