Search for: "Chrysler Corp. v. United States" Results 1 - 20 of 100
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Aug 2021, 1:35 pm by John Coyle
  At a minimum, however, the Myhra decision is inconsistent with the Supreme Court’s admonition in Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 10:44 pm by Josh Blackman
Cullen ed. 1984) (quoted in Daimler Chrysler Corp. v. [read post]
20 Nov 2020, 3:44 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Acknowledging that the FDCA does not contain a private right of action, the district court relied on Chrysler Corp. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 9:16 am by Daniel Hemel
Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit in a 1973 case, In re Bob Richards Chrysler-Plymouth Corp., involving the bankruptcy of the Bob Richards Chrysler-Plymouth car dealer. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 12:35 pm by Daniel Hemel
Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit announced it in the 1973 case In re Bob Richards Chrysler-Plymouth Corp. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 7:55 am by Daniel Hemel
This was the circumstance facing United Western Bank, whose eight-year wait for a $4 million refund gave rise to Rodriguez v. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 6:21 pm by Wolfgang Demino
Golden advances these allegations on behalf of an alleged class of similarly situated individuals who have declared bankruptcy since 2005 across the United States, with loans originated or serviced by the Defendants. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 1:42 pm by MOTP
AN Luxury Imports, Ltd. d/b/a BMW of 2 Dallas (BMW Dallas), AN Luxury Imports GP, LLC, and United States Warranty Corp. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 1:42 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
AN Luxury Imports, Ltd. d/b/a BMW of 2 Dallas (BMW Dallas), AN Luxury Imports GP, LLC, and United States Warranty Corp. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 1:30 pm by Maureen Johnston
National Screen Service Corp. and Zenith Radio Corp. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
June. 13, 2013), holding essentially that, since those meanies on the United States Supreme Court aren’t letting plaintiffs sue generic manufacturers, we’ll change Alabama common law and let them sue someone else. [read post]