Search for: "Chrysler Corp. v. United States" Results 41 - 60 of 60
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 May 2010, 7:21 am by Andrew Frisch
Chrysler Credit Corp., 780 S.2d 1260, 1264 (5th Cir.1986).’ “ In the instant suit, Oliverios were the employers of McDougal prior to July 17, 2007 and therefore responsible for any FLSA and WPCA claims arising for work performed by McDougal up to July 17th. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 12:35 pm by Daniel Hemel
Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit announced it in the 1973 case In re Bob Richards Chrysler-Plymouth Corp. [read post]
19 Mar 2009, 1:59 am
As a matter of faith, he understands himself to be three separate beings: (1) GARY C LIZALEK, "a trust that was created by the Social Security Administration … to generate assets for its beneficiary, the United States Government"; (2) Gary C. [read post]
20 Sep 2007, 12:02 pm
United States, 996 F.2d 1121, 1125 n.3 (11th Cir. 1993); Crimm v. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 1:27 pm
One of the most contentious and complicated emerging issues of corporate law in the United States is the issue of attorney client privilege when it is asserted by an entity. [read post]
The very concept of “debtor-in-possession” suggests a belief in the chance of renewal which is absent from the “receivership style” of insolvency prevalent outside the United States. [read post]
20 Nov 2020, 3:44 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Acknowledging that the FDCA does not contain a private right of action, the district court relied on Chrysler Corp. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2021, 1:35 pm by John Coyle
  At a minimum, however, the Myhra decision is inconsistent with the Supreme Court’s admonition in Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 6:21 pm by Wolfgang Demino
Golden advances these allegations on behalf of an alleged class of similarly situated individuals who have declared bankruptcy since 2005 across the United States, with loans originated or serviced by the Defendants. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 1:22 pm by Bexis
Rather:A federal court may act as a judicial pioneer when interpreting the United States Constitution and federal law. . . . [read post]
4 Oct 2012, 5:00 am by Bexis
Mensing, the author waves the now-tattered banner of Conte v. [read post]