Search for: "Citizens Protecting Michigan's Constitution v. Secretary of State"
Results 1 - 20
of 29
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe:
5 Sep 2012, 6:10 am
The case is Citizens for More Michigan Jobs v. [read post]
19 Oct 2008, 1:10 pm
Secretary of State, (MI Ct. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 4:02 am
In Protect MI Constitution v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 8:26 am
Secretary of State, the court granted Protect MI Constitution leave to intervene and granted William Birdseye and the Police Officers Association of Michigan leave to file amici briefs. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 10:11 am
In Protect Our Jobs v. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 12:42 pm
Pursuant to MCR 7.317(C)(3), the Michigan Supreme Court directed the Clerk of the Court to issue judgment orders in four cases relating to ballot petitions to amend the Michigan Constitution: In Protect Our Jobs v. [read post]
24 Jan 2010, 8:58 pm
Michigan Chamber of Commerce, 494 U. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 12:14 pm
Chancery Courts were first created in 1855, but not protected under the 1864 constitution. [read post]
14 Mar 2015, 3:20 am
<> CRC Report: Use of Immediate Effect in Michigan - The 2015-16 legislative session is underway and the Michigan legislature is again up to the standard practice of granting immediate effect to almost every law enacted -- a new Citizens Research Council of Michigan (CRC) report identifies the need for reform -- either of the Constitution to reflect legislative practice or of legislative… [read post]
23 Jun 2019, 3:28 am
Michigan Lawprof Nicholas Bagley raises the alarm that, based upon the Supreme Court’s decision in Gundy v. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 3:12 pm
Feeney, and Romer v. [read post]
1 May 2015, 8:58 am
Michigan News <> Attorney General v. [read post]
13 May 2008, 1:56 pm
Cox, No. 07-1103 In an action alleging vindictive prosecution against Michigan's Attorney General, a state Supreme Court Justice, and the state's Secretary of State, as well as others in the AG's office, dismissal of plaintiffs' claims and imposition of sanctions against them are affirmed where: 1) because the issues raised in a state court were substantially the same as those raised in the district court, because those… [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 12:00 pm
In a 2012 opinion by Judge William Fletcher, plaintiff’s substantial connections to the United States were held sufficient to entitle her to proceed with her constitutional challenge even though she is not a U.S. citizen or resident in the United States (the opinion may be found at 669 F.3d 983). [read post]
25 Nov 2015, 8:34 am
In Michigan v. [read post]
27 May 2017, 1:56 pm
While on the campaign trail, a non-incumbent presidential candidate has not yet taken the oath to “preserve, protect and defend the Constitution,” U.S. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 12:02 pm
As the director of elections for the Michigan Secretary of State put it, “Never before have I seen such absolutely incredible and unprofessional behavior from lawyers urging this disruption. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 9:01 pm
Constitution. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 1:34 pm
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton put Arizona on noticeceded US land to Mexican drug lords. [read post]
7 Jul 2018, 12:29 pm
In United States v. [read post]
