Search for: "Citizens Protecting Michigan's Constitution v. Secretary of State"
Results 1 - 20
of 56
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Sep 2012, 6:10 am
The case is Citizens for More Michigan Jobs v. [read post]
19 Oct 2008, 1:10 pm
Secretary of State, (MI Ct. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 8:26 am
Secretary of State, the court granted Protect MI Constitution leave to intervene and granted William Birdseye and the Police Officers Association of Michigan leave to file amici briefs. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 4:02 am
In Protect MI Constitution v. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 10:11 am
Citizens for More Jobs v. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 12:42 pm
Pursuant to MCR 7.317(C)(3), the Michigan Supreme Court directed the Clerk of the Court to issue judgment orders in four cases relating to ballot petitions to amend the Michigan Constitution: In Protect Our Jobs v. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 6:59 am
In McDonald v. [read post]
24 Jan 2010, 8:58 pm
Michigan Chamber of Commerce, 494 U. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 1:28 pm
[The fur defendant states in Texas v. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 9:16 am
In other cases, plaintiffs have argued that Election Day ballot receipt deadlines violate a third constitutional provision: the Fourteenth Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 9:06 am
In the 1986 case Moore v. [read post]
14 Mar 2015, 3:20 am
<> CRC Report: Use of Immediate Effect in Michigan - The 2015-16 legislative session is underway and the Michigan legislature is again up to the standard practice of granting immediate effect to almost every law enacted -- a new Citizens Research Council of Michigan (CRC) report identifies the need for reform -- either of the Constitution to reflect legislative practice or of legislative… [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 9:07 pm
" In other words, the Constitution was worth protecting at all costs, lest we descend into some form of tyranny -- which, by definition, is government by man (or men), not by law. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 2:00 am
" In other words, the Constitution was worth protecting at all costs, lest we descend into some form of tyranny -- which, by definition, is government by man (or men), not by law. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 10:38 am
The Michigan secretary of state then released new signature verification guidance, and plaintiffs dropped the suit. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 8:50 am
Michigan Chamber of Commerce, 494 U.S. 652 (1990). [read post]
15 Sep 2019, 4:19 pm
Last August, we blogged about the most recent such case: Carpenter v United States.Carpenter was summarized in our post:Tim Carpenter was convicted in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan for a series of armed robberies in Detroit and across Northern Ohio. [read post]
23 Jun 2019, 3:28 am
Michigan Lawprof Nicholas Bagley raises the alarm that, based upon the Supreme Court’s decision in Gundy v. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 5:14 am
Michigan Gov. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 3:12 pm
Feeney, and Romer v. [read post]
