Search for: "Citizens Protecting Michigan's Constitution v. Secretary of State"
Results 1 - 20
of 67
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Sep 2012, 6:10 am
The case is Citizens for More Michigan Jobs v. [read post]
19 Oct 2008, 1:10 pm
Secretary of State, (MI Ct. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 8:26 am
Secretary of State, the court granted Protect MI Constitution leave to intervene and granted William Birdseye and the Police Officers Association of Michigan leave to file amici briefs. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 4:02 am
In Protect MI Constitution v. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 10:11 am
Citizens for More Jobs v. [read post]
9 Nov 2022, 4:13 am
” In Wednesday’s early hours, the ACLU of Michigan announced victory in the vote and thanked voters for making “Michigan the first state in the nation to pass an affirmative citizen-led constitutional amendment that guarantees the right to abortion. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 12:42 pm
Pursuant to MCR 7.317(C)(3), the Michigan Supreme Court directed the Clerk of the Court to issue judgment orders in four cases relating to ballot petitions to amend the Michigan Constitution: In Protect Our Jobs v. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 6:59 am
In McDonald v. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 1:28 pm
[The fur defendant states in Texas v. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 9:16 am
In other cases, plaintiffs have argued that Election Day ballot receipt deadlines violate a third constitutional provision: the Fourteenth Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 3:00 am
Hate speech is indeed a scourge in our nation, but it is also protected under our Constitution. [read post]
14 Mar 2015, 3:20 am
<> CRC Report: Use of Immediate Effect in Michigan - The 2015-16 legislative session is underway and the Michigan legislature is again up to the standard practice of granting immediate effect to almost every law enacted -- a new Citizens Research Council of Michigan (CRC) report identifies the need for reform -- either of the Constitution to reflect legislative practice or of legislative… [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 9:06 am
In the 1986 case Moore v. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 9:07 pm
" In other words, the Constitution was worth protecting at all costs, lest we descend into some form of tyranny -- which, by definition, is government by man (or men), not by law. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 2:00 am
" In other words, the Constitution was worth protecting at all costs, lest we descend into some form of tyranny -- which, by definition, is government by man (or men), not by law. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 10:38 am
The Michigan secretary of state then released new signature verification guidance, and plaintiffs dropped the suit. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 2:02 pm
The ballot restrictions there were permissible because they “served the state interest in protecting the integrity and regularity of the election process, an interest independent of any attempt to evade the constitutional prohibition against the imposition of additional qualifications for service in Congress. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 2:35 pm
The ballot restrictions there were permissible because they “served the state interest in protecting the integrity and regularity of the election process, an interest independent of any attempt to evade the constitutional prohibition against the imposition of additional qualifications for service in Congress. [read post]
15 Sep 2019, 4:19 pm
Last August, we blogged about the most recent such case: Carpenter v United States.Carpenter was summarized in our post:Tim Carpenter was convicted in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan for a series of armed robberies in Detroit and across Northern Ohio. [read post]
23 Jun 2019, 3:28 am
Michigan Lawprof Nicholas Bagley raises the alarm that, based upon the Supreme Court’s decision in Gundy v. [read post]
