Search for: "Citizens United v. FEC" Results 101 - 120 of 782
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Sep 2009, 9:36 am
The Supreme Court announced Friday that the audiotape of next Wednesday’s oral argument in a major campaign finance case, Citizens United v. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 3:27 pm by Matt Sundquist
Reactions to today's decision dominated the news cycle. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 11:04 am by Ashby Jones
The BLT blog writes: The FEC had tried to argue that Citizens United did not apply in the case because the earlier decision involved spending limits, not contribution limits. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 5:20 pm by Lawrence Solum
Shown by recent polls to be one of the most unpopular cases in U.S. history, Citizens United v. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 8:34 am by Beck, et al.
We have no intention of wading into the treacherous (and heated) debate about Citizens United v. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 8:30 am by
It begins: Last week, the press was full of retrospectives on the one-year anniversary of the Supreme Court's decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
15 Aug 2009, 6:00 pm by James
At 10AM on September 9th, the Supreme Court will sit for a special rehearing of Citizens United v. [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 12:06 pm
Scotusblog has a summary  and analysis  of today's oral argument in Citizens United, which suggests that a majority of the Court is leaning strongly towards overturning Austin v. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 2:08 am by
Here is the abstract: The Court in January of 2010 rocked the nation when it decided Citizens United v. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 9:13 am by Andy Hoffman
Supreme Court just rained down on this country with its decision yesterday in Citizens United v. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 7:05 am by Rebecca Zietlow
Last week, the Supreme Court heard the oral argument Citizens United v. [read post]
4 Aug 2009, 3:35 am
The briefs are flooding in for the Citizens United case, where the Supreme Court unexpectedly ended the Term not by issuing a decision, but by ordering the parties to submit additional briefs on whether the Court should overrule Austin v. [read post]