Search for: "City & County of San Francisco v. Scott" Results 1 - 20 of 60
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Dec 2021, 7:27 am by CFM Admin
Clients, Friends, Associates: As we near the end of 2021, we have developed a checklist to help managers effectively oversee the business and regulatory landscape for the coming year. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 1:13 pm by Ilya Somin
City and County of San Francisco, a unanimous per curiam decision issued earlier today, the Supreme Court gave a boost to property owners' right to file federal takings cases against state and local governments. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 10:12 am by John Elwood
City and County of San Francisco, California, 20-1212, concerns when a takings claim becomes ripe for review. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 8:01 am by William Ford, Victoria Gallegos
The committee will hear testimony from Dana Nessel, attorney general of Michigan; Aaron Ford, attorney general of Nevada; and John Chisholm, district attorney of Milwaukee County, Wisconsin. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 9:43 am by CFM Admin
December 16, 2020 Clients, Friends, Associates: As we prepare for a new year, we also reflect on an eventful, sometimes chaotic, 2020, dominated by the emergence of the novel coronavirus (“COVID-19”). [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal A Conspiracy of Hunches: Roger Stone trial set to start this week San Francisco Chronicle – Devlin Barrett, Spencer Hsu, and Manuel Roig-Franzia (Washington Post) | Published: 11/4/2019 Roger Stone is on trial in federal court, where prosecutors plan to dive back into an episode of political chicanery, alleged lies, and conspiratorial texts that parallels the nascent impeachment inquiry into his longtime friend President Trump. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 6:54 am by Stephen Wermiel
City and County of San Francisco that the outcome of such a state-court claim could preclude a lawsuit in federal court. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 3:46 pm by Abbott & Kindermann
City and County of San Francisco, 545 U.S. 323 (2005), which held that a state court’s resolution of a claim for just compensation under state law generally has preclusive effect in any subsequent federal suit. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 3:46 pm by Glen C. Hansen
City and County of San Francisco, 545 U.S. 323 (2005), which held that a state court’s resolution of a claim for just compensation under state law generally has preclusive effect in any subsequent federal suit. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 6:17 pm by justia.admin
City and County of San Francisco, where the Court held that there was no way to preserve a federal takings claim if an owner seeks just compensation in state court. [read post]
22 Jun 2019, 6:32 am by Miriam Seifter
City and County of San Francisco,  often means that local takings plaintiffs are barred from federal court altogether, a consequence that Williamson County did not foreshadow or perhaps even foresee. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 6:50 pm by Ben Rubin
City and County of San Francisco, 545 U.S. 323 (2005), the Supreme Court held that a state court’s resolution of a takings claim would essentially govern in any subsequent federal lawsuit. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 12:46 pm by Mark Walsh
City and County of San Francisco, which held that a state court’s resolution of a claim for just compensation under state law will generally preclude any federal suit. [read post]