Search for: "City and County of San Francisco v. Superior Court"
Results 81 - 100
of 205
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jun 2019, 12:26 am
Los Angeles Superior Court. [read post]
30 Nov 2007, 5:23 am
The city relied upon the ripeness rule of Williamson County Regional Planning Comm'n v. [read post]
24 Aug 2021, 7:14 am
Superior Court of California, City and County of San Francisco, August 2021).The question presented concerns Section 77z-1(b)(1) of the PSLRA, which provides, "In any private action arising under [the Securities Act of 1933], all discovery and other proceedings shall be stayed during the pendency of any motion to dismiss, unless the court finds, upon the motion of any party, that particularized discovery is necessary to preserve… [read post]
20 Jul 2021, 6:55 pm
City & County of San Francisco, 49 Cal. 3d 881, 888 (1989); Louis at 987; Waidla at 730-31. [read post]
18 Apr 2022, 8:54 am
Superior Court on behalf of California counties in In re Elisa B. [read post]
7 May 2014, 10:10 am
City and County of San Francisco, Case No. 12-15070 (9th Cir. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 10:12 am
First, County of Santa Clara v. [read post]
24 Nov 2015, 12:03 pm
San Francisco Baykeeper, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Aug 2007, 4:26 pm
In a sweeping ruling reminiscent of trial court decisions from Washington State, San Francisco, New York City and Baltimore that have been issued in recent years, Robert B. [read post]
30 Aug 2007, 4:26 pm
In a sweeping ruling reminiscent of trial court decisions from Washington State, San Francisco, New York City and Baltimore that have been issued in recent years, Robert B. [read post]
1 Apr 2020, 4:33 pm
In a published opinion filed March 24, 2020, the Fourth District Court of Appeal (Division One) reversed a judgment of dismissal with prejudice, entered by the San Diego County Superior Court after sustaining a demurrer without leave on statute of limitations grounds to a group’s action challenging the CEQA review for Caltrans’ Interstate 5 (I-5)/State Route 56 (SR 56) freeway interchange project (the “Project”). [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 11:39 am
In a published opinion filed September 28, 2017, the First District Court of Appeal affirmed the Alameda County Superior Court’s judgment denying appellant Living Rivers Council’s (LRC) writ petition challenging the State Water Resources Control Board’s (the “SWRCB” or “Board”) approval of a policy designed to maintain instream flows in coastal streams north of San Francisco. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 11:39 am
In a published opinion filed September 28, 2017, the First District Court of Appeal affirmed the Alameda County Superior Court’s judgment denying appellant Living Rivers Council’s (LRC) writ petition challenging the State Water Resources Control Board’s (the “SWRCB” or “Board”) approval of a policy designed to maintain instream flows in coastal streams north of San Francisco. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 12:03 pm
City & County of San Francisco (2019) 33 Cal.App.5th 321. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 7:49 am
Superior Court of California, City and County of San Francisco asked the Court to address whether the PSLRA stays discovery in Securities Act cases brought in state court, or only those brought in federal court. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 12:30 pm
City and County of San Francisco (2014) 222 Cal.App.4th 209. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 9:04 am
City and County of San Francisco, 545 U. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 3:50 pm
Labor Commissioner Bradstreet is now the Honorable Judge Bradstreet on the San Francisco County Superior Court as a result of the former Governor's appointment. [read post]
31 May 2020, 9:56 am
NorCal ACLU filed in Alameda County Superior Court, demanding the release of inmates vulnerable to COVID-19. [read post]
10 Jan 2008, 12:15 am
The stay means San Francisco companies with 50 or more employees must now spend a minimum amount on private or city-provided health care coverage for their workers. [read post]
