Search for: "City of Boerne v. Flores" Results 1 - 20 of 136
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Nov 2011, 4:32 pm by Eugene Volokh
Thus, in my experience the “Boerne” in City of Boerne v. [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 12:20 pm by Howard Friedman
 While serving in that role, she was one of the attorneys who wrote the U.S. government's brief in City of Boerne v. [read post]
25 Oct 2013, 7:30 am by Dan Ernst
Davis, announced that the Fourteenth Amendment’s equal protection clause and the Fifteenth Amendment’s ban on racial exclusions from voting protected only against provably intentional race discrimination; and Cruikshank, not the Civil Rights Cases or City of Boerne v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 4:10 pm by Richard Hasen
But in NAMUDNO, the Court raised the possibility that a line of Fourteenth Amendment power cases beginning with City of Boerne v. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 4:30 am by Lawrence Solum
  Here is the abstract: This short essay argues that the congruence and proportionality test of City of Boerne v. [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm by ernst
Madison (1803), Ex parte McCardle (1869), and City of Boerne v. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 1:30 pm by Thomas Key
Further, the record failed to consider whether these cases were constitutional violations as deprivations of property without due process of law; although City of Boerne v. [read post]
11 Feb 2013, 2:22 pm by Doug Kendall
As University of Kentucky law professor Josh Douglas has pointed out over at PrawfsBlawg, it’s really hard to find a credible academic to provide “balance” to a panel discussion on Shelby (though Cato’s Ilya Shapiro has gamely offered to fill this void).Perhaps the problem is that many conservative scholars have been harshly critical of the Court’s jurisprudence on this topic, especially the “congruence and proportionality” test established in City… [read post]
10 Jan 2009, 1:52 am
Alternatively, they argue that §5 is unconstitutional when set to the congruence-and-proportionality test set out in City of Boerne v. [read post]