Search for: "City of Cleveland v. United States" Results 101 - 120 of 152
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Feb 2012, 1:30 pm by Benjamin Wittes
From 2001 to 2004, while I was in private practice in New York City, I also chaired the Judiciary Committee of the New York City Bar Association, which rates all the nominees and candidates for federal, state and local judicial office in New York City.  [read post]
1 Jan 2012, 8:19 am by J. Gordon Hylton
Milwaukeeans had to wait until December 12 to learn that the United States Supreme Court had denied the state’s petition for certiorari. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 11:28 am by Christopher Wright
The United States lists about a dozen statutes that are similar to RESPA in that they authorize damages without a showing of harm in a particular case.  [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 12:32 pm by Lawrence Solum
Charles (Government of the United States of America - Air Force) has posted The Faces of the Second Amendment Outside the Home: History Versus Ahistorical Standards of Review (Cleveland State Law Review, Vol. 60, No. 1, 2012) on SSRN. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 12:55 pm by sue.altmeyer@law.csuohio.edu
The Fair Housing Clinic represents the plaintiff, a purchaser of real estate and Cleveland resident, who allegedly was affected by an exclusive agreement between her title insurance agent, Tower City Title, and issuer of title insurance policies, First American.  [read post]
27 May 2011, 7:32 am by Dan Markel
Farber (Northeastern University) Privacy in the Workplace: City of Ontario v Quon *Clifford S Fishman (Catholic University of America) Consent-To-Search and Dignity *Josephine Ross (Howard University) Abstract: This country is at a crossroads regarding privacy. [read post]
23 May 2011, 12:00 am
When I registered at The United States Sentencing Commission seminar, I got the same jolt to the system as I got the first time I stepped into a federal courtroom. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 3:55 am
The Fourteenth Amendment means that a local or state government employer may not involuntarily retire a public employee from his or her work without due process of law, citing Board of Regents v Roth, 408 U.S. 564 and Cleveland Board of Education v Loudermill, 470 U.S. 532; and3. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 8:43 am by J. Gordon Hylton
Baseball’s antitrust exemption, first recognized in the United States Supreme Court’s 1922 Federal Baseball Club v. [read post]