Search for: "City of Long Beach v. Marshall" Results 1 - 20 of 25
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2022, 12:28 am by Bill Henderson
”  See “One of Long Island’s Stateliest Homes,” Town & Country (Nov. 30, 2007) at 12. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 5:01 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
(hereinafter Consulting) was awarded a contract to perform concrete work on a construction project involving a residential high-rise apartment building being constructed in Long Island City. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 5:42 am by bhorton
That is exactly the interpretation of the Elections Clauses that Justice Thomas has long advocated. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 5:42 am
That is exactly the interpretation of the Elections Clauses that Justice Thomas has long advocated. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 2:35 pm by opseo
And once the petition was issued, a simple majority of those landholders could vote to create the MMD and seek the required approval from the City Council and Texas Legislature. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Fiut, Harris Beach PLLC, on the brief), Buffalo, New York.Appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Western District of New York (Frank P. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 12:19 pm by Mark Walsh
City of Riviera Beach, Florida, a ruling breathlessly awaited by hosts of Supreme Court podcasts all over the world. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 1:42 pm by John Hochfelder
On May 26, 2010 Marshall Starkman was sunbathing on a beach chair when a City of Long Beach police officer struck him while driving his SUV patrol car. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 9:19 am by Charles Fried
Ogden Chief Justice Marshall had written that the Clause empowered Congress to lay down the rule by which commerce (not persons in commerce) could be regulated. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:20 pm by carie
”On September 9th last year, Stevens engaged in a classic version of advocacy-by-interrogation during the argument of Citizens United v. [read post]
26 May 2010, 6:46 am by Adam Chandler
City of Chicago; the ruling, it explains, “could give a chance at relief to minority groups, women, the elderly[,] the disabled and others claiming to be victims of a discriminatory employment practice long after the practice went into effect. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 10:14 am by Hilde
”On September 9th last year, Stevens engaged in a classic version of advocacy-by-interrogation during the argument of Citizens United v. [read post]