Search for: "City of Los Angeles v. Public Utilities Commission"
Results 1 - 20
of 94
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Aug 2010, 7:00 am
Public Service Utilities Commission (1980) 447 U.S. 557 case applies. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 1:09 pm
City of Los Angeles (Rony Shram, et al, Real Parties in Interest) (2023) ___ Cal.App.5th ___. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 12:00 pm
Los Angeles County, March 26, 2015). [read post]
22 May 2019, 2:29 pm
Just ask the Los Angeles City Attorney after the recent decision by the California Court of Appeals in The People v. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 12:17 pm
Reversing the ruling (and regulation) of the Public Utilities Commission, which had allowed the practice.San Clemente and the PUC had at least a colorable argument that the relevant statutes and regulations only required that a horn be "sounded" at the crossing. [read post]
28 Sep 2013, 5:26 pm
The California Public Utility Commission finally decided to create a separate category for these programs labeling them, “Transportation Network Companies” and to issue regulations related to these entities. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 8:52 am
City of Los Angeles (2007) 153 Cal.App.4th 1385)? [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 4:09 am
We had a great time at the event, and think combining the IRWA and Appraisal Institute for a joint meeting is a great tradition practiced in Los Angeles. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 8:53 am
City of Los Angeles (2009) 177 Cal.App.4th 837. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 9:04 am
EIRs: PUBLIC SERVICES/RECREATION IMPACTS City of Hayward v. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 10:59 am
(B245131; 224 Cal.App.4th 1105; Los Angeles County Superior Court; BS131347.) [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:44 pm
Kelo v. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 9:48 am
City of Los Angeles (2007) 153 Cal.App.4th 1385)? [read post]
11 May 2015, 8:22 am
In City Council of Los Angeles v. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 9:17 am
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit recently denied rail opponents’ petition for review of the STB’s decision (Kings City v. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 9:17 am
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit recently denied rail opponents’ petition for review of the STB’s decision (Kings City v. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 8:37 am
Marina Coast Water District v. [read post]
Appellate Court Shuts Out Trial Court in CEQA/ESA Double Header under Deferential Standard of Review
3 Apr 2014, 11:08 am
The EIR related to general planning and conservation steps resulting from Los Angeles County’s prior approval of a 12,000 acre specific plan and neighboring 1500 acre conservation area in Ventura County. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 9:34 am
City of Los Angeles (2007) 153 Cal.App.4th 1385), or is the agency’s decision subject to a threshold determination whether the modification of the project constitutes a “new project altogether,” as a matter of law (Save Our Neighborhood v. [read post]
8 Feb 2022, 8:58 am
County of Los Angeles, (January 21, 2022) 2022 Cal.App. [read post]
