Search for: "City of Richmond v. United States"
Results 21 - 40
of 183
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jul 2022, 9:08 am
Susan LePage, the defendant, LePage, signed a Confidentiality and Non-Solicitation Agreement (the “Agreement”) in 2019 that included a forum selection clause granting exclusive jurisdiction of any disputes arising thereunder to “the courts of the Commonwealth of Virginia located in the City of Richmond and of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, Richmond Division. [read post]
20 May 2022, 2:29 pm
In Lehman v. [read post]
13 Apr 2022, 12:43 pm
Thus, he joined a dissent by Chief Justice Melville Fuller in United States v. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 3:00 am
Manchin, Sinema Join with GOP in Rejecting Attempt to Change Filibuster Rules, Effectively Killing Democratic Voting Bill MSN – Mike DeBonis (Washington Post) | Published: 1/19/2022 The year-long Democratic push for federal voting rights legislation died in the Senate after Republicans blocked an elections bill for the fifth time in six months and Democrats failed to unite their caucus behind a plan to rewrite the chamber’s rules and pass it anyway. [read post]
19 Jan 2022, 11:25 am
From Jackson v. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 5:59 pm
On Tuesday, the Supreme Court will delve into that question in United States v. [read post]
3 Nov 2021, 3:40 am
See State v. [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 1:09 pm
City of Richmond (1912) or Carter v. [read post]
27 Aug 2021, 4:00 am
In Shelby County v. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 9:01 pm
In Fulton v. [read post]
20 Feb 2021, 1:26 pm
" Pleasant Grove City, Utah v. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 3:00 am
The Project is owned and operated by the United States Bureau of Reclamation (“Bureau”) and discharges significant quantities of selenium and other pollutants into state and federal wildlife refuges leading into the Delta. [read post]
31 Oct 2020, 9:07 am
People v. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 3:14 pm
But a partly public funding program limited to people of particular races or ethnic groups generally violates the Equal Protection Clause (see, e.g., City of Richmond v. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 12:36 pm
” It follows the Trump v. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 1:58 pm
[6.18.2020] In what will likely be seen as a landmark decision for years to come, on Monday, June 15, 2020, the Supreme Court of the United States handed down an opinion in the case Bostock v. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 11:12 am
In City of Oakland et al. v. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 11:12 am
In City of Oakland et al. v. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 1:11 pm
City of Richmond (2010) 184 Cal.App.4th 70; Rodeo Citizens Assn. v. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 5:02 am
"In making the decision [whether to seal], the court should consider less restrictive 'alternatives to sealing [that] provide an adequate record for review' and should 'state the reasons for its decision [with] specific findings.'" United States v. [read post]
