Search for: "City of Sacramento v. Superior Court" Results 61 - 80 of 92
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Oct 2011, 9:39 am
Separately, 10 Southern California cities and their redevelopment agencies[2] filed a complaint for declaratory and injunctive relief and a petition for a writ of mandate with the Superior Court for Sacramento County on September 26, 2011. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 8:52 am by Bryn Miller
  And if cities and counties fail to do so timely, they could be liable for attorney’s fees and costs incurred by any resident who petitions the superior court for an order adopting supervisorial and council district boundaries, as well as the costs associated with a special master if the superior court appoints one to assist the court with adopting new district boundaries.15 Senate Bill 970 Would Change Redistricting Deadlines for… [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 11:51 am by Arthur F. Coon
Superior Court (2003) 113 Cal.App.4th 1, 13 [CEQA petitioners, as the parties “with the most to gain from any underinclusion,” bear “the burden of showing prejudice from any overinclusion of materials into the administrative record”]; Stockton Citizens For Sensible Planning v. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 10:11 pm by Mike
 The Superior Court granted the petition for habeas corpus and the California Court of Appeals reversed. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 1:12 pm by Arthur F. Coon
City of Sacramento (2004) 124 Cal.App.4th 903, 928, internal quotes omitted), and “[t]he petitioner bears the burden of proof to demonstrate by citation to the record the existence of substantial evidence supporting a fair argument of significant environmental impact. [read post]