Search for: "City of San Jose v. Superior Court"
Results 21 - 40
of 86
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Apr 2019, 9:46 am
San Jacinto Agency, Inc. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 4:50 pm
The litigant could live in San Jose, the city where the probate court in Santa Clara County is located. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 7:51 am
City of Chicago, the Court held that the Second Amendment applies to the states. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 11:03 pm
City of San Jose, 136 S. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 9:32 am
City of Chicago, the Court held that the Second Amendment applies to the states. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 5:28 pm
(D068185; 4 Cal.App.5th 103; San Diego County Superior Court; 37-2014-00013481- CU-TT-CTL.) [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 4:39 pm
City of San Jose, (2015) 61 Cal.4th 435, which upheld a residential inclusionary zoning ordinance by the City of San Jose. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 4:39 pm
City of San Jose, (2015) 61 Cal.4th 435, which upheld a residential inclusionary zoning ordinance by the City of San Jose. [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 9:33 am
Given that the California Supreme Court, in City of San Jose v. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 2:30 pm
This bill is aimed at religiously affiliated institutions, noting (in language that would not be codified) the Legislature’s agreement with Justice Alito in Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church and School v. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 1:58 pm
Likely in response to the California Supreme Court’s December 23, 2016 ruling in Augustus v. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 2:11 pm
Superior Court (2013) 218 Cal.App.4th 577, 598; Consolidated Irrigation Dist. v. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 8:47 am
Cucchi City of San Jose v. [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 5:15 pm
Kalinski The California Supreme Court today reversed the Court of Appeal in City of San Jose v. [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 3:11 pm
Today, the California Supreme Court decided a case of interest to all of our friends who work for the government, City of San Jose v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 8:56 am
(D063288; 231 Cal.App.4th 1056, mod. 231 Cal.App.4th 1437a; San Diego County Superior Court; 37-2011-00101593-CU-TT-CTL, 37-2011-00101660-CU-TTCTL.) [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 2:26 pm
Superior Court (1994) 26 Cal.App.4th 92, 99; see also Landry v. [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 8:47 am
In Seibert v. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 4:26 pm
” Dragline responds, anointing himself as Luke’s “official egg peeler,” and tells “Society,” in one of the best lines of the film: “You just may be great at hanging paper around big cities. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 12:58 pm
City of San Jose, __ Cal. 4th __ (June 15, 2015, Case No. [read post]
