Search for: "City of San Jose v. Superior Court"
Results 41 - 60
of 86
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Apr 2014, 12:30 pm
City of San Diego v. [read post]
18 Apr 2022, 8:54 am
San Francisco Public Library Commission, which held that the library could hold closed sessions to nominate candidates for City Librarian and serving as amicus on behalf of fifty cities in the City of San Jose v. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 5:00 am
Superior Court (1992) 2 Cal.4th 1254, 1267, 10 Cal.Rptr.2d 538, 833 P.2d 545; Committee on Children's Television, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Oct 2007, 6:31 am
The commission found that in one case, City of Moreno Valley v. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 4:39 pm
City of San Jose, (2015) 61 Cal.4th 435, which upheld a residential inclusionary zoning ordinance by the City of San Jose. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 4:39 pm
City of San Jose, (2015) 61 Cal.4th 435, which upheld a residential inclusionary zoning ordinance by the City of San Jose. [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 7:58 pm
City of San Jose (2020) 49 Cal.App.5th 127, and my 5/22/20 post on it can be found here. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 6:29 am
San Jose, 485 U. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 7:51 am
City of Chicago, the Court held that the Second Amendment applies to the states. [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 9:33 am
Given that the California Supreme Court, in City of San Jose v. [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 3:00 am
City of San Jose (2021) 60 Cal.App.5th 783. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 7:20 am
B198118 In class action complaints against the County of Los Angeles alleging that the county imposed new utility user taxes without prior approval by the voters as required by law, and also raising a related equal protection claim, county's petition for a writ of mandate challenging certification of a class in the matter is denied as: 1) the rule from City of San Jose v. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 12:04 pm
” Id., at 5 (quoting City of San Jose v. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 3:00 am
(C071785; 39 Cal.App.5th 708; Yolo County Superior Court; CVCV091258.) [read post]
12 Nov 2008, 10:00 pm
" (City of San Jose v. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 10:39 am
” City of San Jose v. [read post]
8 Jan 2008, 1:41 pm
Superior Court, No. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 5:28 pm
Even in the context of prevention of secrecy in government, "the public interest in protecting the privacy of noise complainants and in preventing a chilling effect on complaints, clearly outweighs the public interest in disclosure of complainants' names…" City of San Jose v. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 9:46 am
San Jacinto Agency, Inc. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 5:28 pm
(D068185; 4 Cal.App.5th 103; San Diego County Superior Court; 37-2014-00013481- CU-TT-CTL.) [read post]
