Search for: "City of Valdez v. Alaska" Results 1 - 12 of 12
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Mar 2009, 1:06 pm
City of Valdez, which is to be heard tomorrow morning at 10am. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 6:30 am
The Court, in a 7-2 decision reversing the Alaska Supreme Court, held that a tax implemented by the City of Valdez, Alaska on "[b]oats and vessels of at least 95 feet in length"   that regularly use the City's port violated the Tonnage Clause. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 11:35 am
City of Valdez, Alaska (08-310) is available here. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 3:00 am
City of Valdez, Alaska (08-310), on the city’s tax on large vessels from out-of-state that use its harbor. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 8:08 pm
City of Valdez (08-310) and in the consolidated cases of  Travelers Indemnity v. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 7:04 pm
City of Valdez (08-310) involves a property tax that Valdez, a town of 4,500 people in Alaska, imposed on oil tankers and other large vessels putting into its port, mainly  to pick up crude oil for delivery elsewhere. [read post]
26 Nov 2008, 7:17 pm
City of Valdez, Alaska Issue: Whether a municipal tax that falls exclusively on large vessels in the city’s harbor violates the Tonnage Clause, Commerce Clause, or Due Process Clause. [read post]
27 Jul 2008, 3:27 pm
Williams, we posted that the writing was clearly on the wall to the effect that punitive damages had "peaked out" in American law.That conclusion was strongly supported in the US Supreme Court's recent decision in the Exxon Valdez punitive damages case, Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 7:07 am
In two rulings on the merits, the Court struck down,  by a 7-2 vote, a tax imposed by the city of Valdez, Alaska, on cargo ships that used its port (Polar Tankers v. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 4:00 am
” In brief, the Tonnage Clause prohibits states from limiting commerce by taxing the vessels used for transportation of imports or exports without the consent of Congress.In 1999, the city of Valdez, Alaska, imposed a tax that essentially fell only on oil tankers. [read post]
12 Jan 2009, 4:51 pm
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 08-212) claiming that it may lose as much as $125 million in refunds it had expected in compensation for differences in quality in crude oil delivered by pipeline from fields in Alaska’s North Slope to Valdez, Alaska. ** The Court chose to bypass an appeal by a major automaker (General Motors v. [read post]