Search for: "Civil Rights Cases"
Results 281 - 300
of 65,364
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm
If a defendant invokes their Fifth Amendment right, is the court able to draw any adverse inference? [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 6:58 am
If you are charged with a DUI it is smart to speak to an attorney about your rights. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 6:30 am
On June 29, 2023, the Supreme Court found Harvard and UNC’s admissions policies, which considered race and ethnicity as factors in admissions, to be unlawful under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 6:30 am
On June 29, 2023, the Supreme Court found Harvard and UNC’s admissions policies, which considered race and ethnicity as factors in admissions, to be unlawful under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 6:25 am
Meadows (Aug. 23, 2023) (Case No. 1:23-cv-3621) (hereinafter “Def’s Reply”). [read post]
26 Aug 2023, 3:05 pm
An individual cannot benefit from Amendment 821 if they: Had any prior criminal history points;Used violence or credible threats of violence in connection with the offense;Caused death or serious bodily injury because of the offense;Committed a sex offense;Personally caused substantial financial hardship;Received a terrorism adjustment under § 3A1.4;Possessed, received, purchased, transported, transferred, sold, or disposed of a firearm or other dangerous weapon (or induced another person… [read post]
26 Aug 2023, 4:58 am
Aggrieved employees can (and often do) pursue civil litigation for damages. 8. [read post]
26 Aug 2023, 4:05 am
Post Scriptum In case you missed it… U.S. v. [read post]
26 Aug 2023, 3:37 am
The school board decided that would no longer be the case, and neither advance warning nor an option to opt out was permitted. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 4:34 pm
Unadorned, this case condenses to this: who decides whether Langford is a Kappa Kappa Gamma sister? [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 2:37 pm
However, in a civil lawsuit for discrimination or harassment, a “he said, she said” case can have distinct benefits. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 11:31 am
Plaintiff brought this suit alleging violations of California's common carrier law, the Unruh Civil Rights Act, the California Unfair Competition Law, and the Federal Telecommunications Act, as well as claims alleging intentional and negligent interference with prospective economic relations, and negligence under California Civil Code § 2162. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 9:56 am
This claim took some steps, if not enough, to address EFF’s concerns about coders rights. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 7:13 am
Showing that the accused’s constitutional rights were violated can lead to the exclusion of evidence and can significantly weaken, if not altogether destroy, the prosecution’s case. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 6:41 am
” The lawsuit asserts seven causes of action based on alleged violations of the Dormant Commerce Clause, Due Process rights based on statutory vagueness and unreasonable exercise of police power, Equal Protection under the federal and New Jersey constitutions, the Privileges and Immunities Clause, and federal and New Jersey civil rights statutes. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 5:52 am
The DOJ’s Civil Rights Division is known for undertaking “pattern-or-practice” investigations to diagnose and remedy systemic discrimination by local police departments. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 5:30 am
Sullivan, the case that grew out of segregationists’ attempts to quash reporting on the civil rights movement. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 5:01 am
Applicant's motion fails to satisfy the compelling reasons standard as supplemented by Civil Local Rule 79-5. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 5:00 am
However, there is a “serious injury” threshold in place to prevent an influx of minor personal injury lawsuits in civil courts. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 4:00 am
Grand Jury on Trump Documents Case Has Ended MSN – Devlin Barrett (Washington Post) | Published: 8/22/2023 The federal grand jury in the District of Columbia that helped investigate Donald Trump’s alleged mishandling of classified documents has ended, special counsel Jack Smith said in a court filing, which laid out new details about how the probe quietly expanded to look at alleged coverup efforts. [read post]
