Search for: "Claiborne v. United States" Results 41 - 60 of 94
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Feb 2019, 9:30 am by Guest Blogger
  And such laws cannot survive even the less stringent standard of review articulated in United States v. [read post]
13 Feb 2007, 8:00 am
  There is a lot in Pickett that merits highlighting, but this paragraph may be my favorite and the most important aspect of the decision (and not just for crack cases, but for all cases):While Booker and § 3553(a) instruct sentencing courts to consider all these "multiple and vague" factors, United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 8:23 am
United States, No. 06-5618 (cert. granted, Nov. 3, 2006); and Rita v. [read post]
4 Nov 2006, 8:07 pm by Anthony Colleluori
In making that determination, is it consistent with United States v. [read post]
14 Dec 2012, 11:54 am by Bexis
It occurs to us that there’s a missing link in the chain which makes United States v. [read post]
11 Jun 2007, 1:41 pm
Here is the question it presents: "Whether, when determining the 'reasonableness' of a district court sentence under United States v. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 5:30 pm
The Sentencing Guidelines’ decision, United States v. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 6:07 am
By its own terms, Georgia’s stalking statute “shall not apply to persons engaged in activities protected by the Constitution of the United States or of this state. [read post]
22 Sep 2017, 4:28 am by Edith Roberts
United States and two related cert petitions the justices will consider at Monday’s “long conference,” the first after their summer recess, that “present what is unquestionably the most important civil-military relations question that [the court has] confronted in decades. [read post]
7 Apr 2012, 10:38 am by Eugene Volokh
Alexandria Women’s Health Clinic, 506 U.S. 263, 275 (1993) (noting that 18 U.S.C. § 241 is “the criminal counterpart of § 1985(3)”); Ex parte Yarbrough, 110 U.S. 651 (1884) (discussing a prosecution under the criminal counterpart of what is now § 1985(3)); United States v. [read post]
18 May 2007, 10:58 am
  My friends cut-and-paste allow a quick summary from the Eighth Circuit's official opinion page:062965P.pdf   05/18/2007  United States  v. [read post]
8 Aug 2020, 12:55 am by INFORRM
Comparative human rights law Baldassi & Others in 2020 reaches the same conclusion as the Supreme Court of the United States in National Association for the Advancement of Colored People v. [read post]