Search for: "Claiborne v. United States" Results 61 - 80 of 96
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jun 2008, 5:30 pm
The Sentencing Guidelines’ decision, United States v. [read post]
11 Jun 2007, 1:41 pm
Here is the question it presents: "Whether, when determining the 'reasonableness' of a district court sentence under United States v. [read post]
11 Jun 2007, 10:22 am
United States, No. 06-7949, and the 8th Cirucit's opinion can be found at United States v. [read post]
11 Jun 2007, 8:03 am
The case involving a claim under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act is Sprint/United Management v. [read post]
5 Jun 2007, 5:02 pm
The district judge in Claiborne thought that the answer was yes, in light of the Supreme Court's conversion of the Guidelines from mandatory to advisory in United States v. [read post]
31 May 2007, 7:09 am
This is big news for judges, prosecutors and criminal defense lawyers around the country who have been waiting for the Supreme Court to decide United States v. [read post]
18 May 2007, 10:58 am
  My friends cut-and-paste allow a quick summary from the Eighth Circuit's official opinion page:062965P.pdf   05/18/2007  United States  v. [read post]
16 May 2007, 3:20 pm
At Sentencing Law and Policy, Doug Berman has this post discussing the recent Sixth Circuit Valentine opinion, a vehicle for the High Court to address Booker retroactivity issues; and this post discussing whether the Court should remand Claiborne given the United States Sentencing Committee's new Cocaine and Federal Sentencing Policy report. [read post]
15 May 2007, 6:56 am
The applicable United States Sentencing Guidelines called for a sentence of between 210 and 262 months of imprisonment, but the district court imposed a sentence of only 72 months. [read post]
3 Mar 2007, 12:25 pm
  And the penultimate substantive paragraph also has this interesting discussion of the pending SCOTUS reasonableness work (background here):We pause briefly to comment on the status of this case in light of the Supreme Court's pending decision in United States v. [read post]