Search for: "Clapp v. Clapp" Results 1 - 20 of 57
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2022, 6:40 am by Erik W. Weibust
Indeed, where that occurs the covenant may not be enforceable, as the Fifth Circuit held earlier this year in Rouses Enterprises, LLC v. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 8:01 am by Meg Martin
Summary of Decision issued July 20, 2010Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme Court.Case Name: Sorensen v. [read post]
24 Mar 2022, 7:41 am by Justin K. Beyer
In its recent unpublished decision of Rouses Enterprises, L.L.C. v. [read post]
27 Oct 2017, 6:05 pm by Randall Hodgkinson
Phillip Clapp, No. 112,842 (Reno)Probation revocation appeal (petition for review) Caroline M. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 8:19 am
To avoid unjust outcomes based on technical violations, absent actual fraud, franchisees did not have an absolute right to rescind a franchise that violated the Franchise Act, the Minnesota Supreme Court held in Clapp v. [read post]
26 May 2020, 6:22 am by Schachtman
  Although Clapp used a study design known to be inaccurate and biased, Bailar touted Clapp’s research over that sponsored by members of the industry. [read post]
14 Mar 2018, 2:32 am by Jon Gelman
 In the NJ Appellate Division, Judge Clapp ruled that ‘* * * if a definite bodily impairment occurs after January 1, 1950, as a result of berylliosis, a right to compensation accrues under the statute at, or possibly subsequent to, the time of the impairment,’ to the exclusion of the common-law remedy for negligence; and that, on the contrary hypothesis, the statute of limitations, “ Biglioli v. [read post]