Search for: "Clark Equipment Co., Appeal of" Results 1 - 20 of 69
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 May 2011, 5:00 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
One James Hoyt Clark appealed a decision of the BPAI to theCAFC, but lost relating to the obviousness of the appealed re-examinedclaims from U.S. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 7:50 pm by Larry
This comes from a 1984 Court of Appeals decision called Jarvis Clark Co. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 3:27 am by Ryan Dolby-Stevens, Olswang LLP
Supreme Court Decision The appeal was heard by a panel of seven Supreme Court justices comprising Lord Neuberger, Lord Mance, Lord Clarke, Lord Sumption, Lord Reed, Lord Carnwath and Lord Hodge. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 2:36 am by Eleonora Rosati
Industrial Cleaning Equipment v Intelligent Cleaning Equipment [2023] EWHC 411 (IPEC) (February 2023)The case title might suggest this is a battle between two highly descriptive marks (ala Office Cleaning), but in fact both of these floor cleaning equipment companies had adopted the abbreviation ICE. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 6:05 am by Alan Neff
  Criminal Indictments Cheeley, Chesebro, Clark, Giuliani, Eastman, Ellis, Powell, and Smith have been indicted in Georgia for their alleged attempts to overturn the 2020 presidential election results in Georgia, including allegedly illegal attempts to access voting equipment. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 5:01 am by Kelly
(America-Israel Patent Law) More on the ILPTO’s notice re PCT priority claims in the USA (America-Israel Patent Law) Commissioner of Patents admits to flouting the law; Status of thousands of patents questionable (America-Israel Patent Law) Rejection of EASYLABOUR for birthing equipment upheld (IP Factor) Ireland Patent tax exemption removed (IP finance) Korean Korean appeal statistics (PatLit) Netherlands District Court of The Hague rejects preliminary injunction request:… [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
Mundy, No. 06-1190 Conviction for possession of marijuana with intent to distribute and possessing a firearm in the furtherance of a drug crime is affirmed over claim that court erred in refusing to instruct the jury that the attempted flight of co-defendant supported an inference of defendant's consciousness of guilt. [read post]