Search for: "Clark v. Allen" Results 121 - 140 of 189
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Mar 2011, 3:30 am by INFORRM
  Leading campaigner David Allen Green had a post on his “New Statesman” blog entitled “The draft libel reform bill is a good thing”. [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
“Miss Sharon Clark complained to the Press Complaints Commission that an article headlined “Dad dies trying to save daughter”, published in the Maidenhead Advertiser on 21 July 2011, included a photograph of her daughter without consent in breach of Clause 6 (Children) of the Editors’ Code of Practice. [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 11:22 pm
On the other hand, there's Lake-Allen v. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 7:43 pm
He flies to Boston every week during the fall to teach with Robert Clark, Harvard Law’s former dean and a leading corporate law scholar. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 2:00 am by INFORRM
On Wednesday 14 June 2023 there was a hearing in the case of WFZ v BBC before Collins Rice J. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 4:35 pm by INFORRM
On the same day, Fancourt J heard two applications in Duke of Sussex v NGN. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 1:02 am by INFORRM
On the same day Collins Rice J will hand down judgment in the cases of Zia Chishti v The Telegraph Media Group and McGee v Lewis. [read post]
27 May 2012, 5:42 pm by INFORRM
(Mrs Laura McQueen v Daily Record, Clause 5, 24/05/2012). [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 12:50 pm by Adam Feldman
In a recent paper, Professors Michael Livermore, Dan Rockmore and Allen Riddel used topic models to longitudinally study agenda formation in the Supreme Court. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:00 am by INFORRM
.” David Allen Green has been vigorously pursuing the question of a hacked email account at the Times, and his post on the matter was cross-posted on Inforrm here. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 1:07 am by INFORRM
On 19 and 20 June 2023 Steyn J heard the harassment case of Clarke v Rose. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 2:56 am by INFORRM
On the same day, there were hearings in the cases of 2 Wakefield Limited v Persons Unknown, Clarke v Rose and Wolverhampton City Council v Kevin Poole. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 4:20 pm by INFORRM
The issue was dismissed by the Justice Secretary, Kenneth Clarke, who was not convinced a public interest defence is necessary to protect journalists who disobey the Bribery Act by paying for stories, Press Gazette reports. [read post]