Search for: "Clark v. Mckenzie"
Results 1 - 20
of 24
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jan 2010, 4:51 am
The origin is in a 1971 English divorce case, McKenzie v McKenzie. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 7:50 am
In this week’s case (Baker v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 10:14 am
Merpel disagrees: it's not possible to separate law from policy on a matter as sensitive as this, she mewses.Some further readingEleonora's katpost of 17 April on the Supreme Court's decision to refer questions to the CJEU here Katpost reporting on the Baker & McKenziie debate on whether this case represents the end of browsing as we know it here Lionel Bently's assault on the Court of Appeal decision in this case, hosted on this weblog here Simon Clark's explanation of why the… [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 2:14 am
On Wednesday 16 November the Privy Council will hand down judgment in Phillip McKenzie v The Queen. [read post]
21 Feb 2020, 5:00 am
Trivial Defect DoctrineIn the case of McKenzie v. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 2:57 am
Eleonora Rosati and Yann Basire with Eleonora's students attending the conferenceThe second panel addressed UK trade mark law, and was composed of Anna Carboni(Wiggin and JIPLP Board Member), Birgit Clark(Baker & McKenzie and JIPLP Board Member), Gill Grassie (Brodies and JIPLP Board Member), and Darren Meale (Simmons & Simmons and JIPLP Board Member). [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 11:39 am
As Lord Justice Clark, Lord Gill chaired a review commission that recommended McKenzie friends be granted rights of audience in the courts. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 2:08 am
The case is BGH, I ZR 164/16 of 20 November; "Parfummarken" (in English "perfume trade marks").Katfriends Oliver Löffel (LÖFFEL ABRAR) and Birgit Clark (Baker McKenzie) report.Here's what they write:“The claimant in the case manufactures and globally distributes various high-end perfumery brands, which are, inter alia, protected by International trade marks that designate the EU. [read post]
11 Sep 2014, 3:10 am
Confirmed event participants include Mr Justice Birss, Trevor Clarke, Bernt Hugenholtz, Peter Leathem, Cedric Manara and Javier Ruiz. [read post]
8 Jun 2017, 4:04 pm
The plaintiff then was granted an application to have a barrister appear as a McKenzie friend. [read post]
9 Feb 2014, 2:27 pm
This post was written by guest Kat Nadia, and posted by Jeremy"Passing Off and Unfair Competition", hosted by Baker & McKenzie LLP, was the subject of the third event held by the Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice (JIPLP) in conjunction with its German partners at GRUR Int.Passing offThe first talk came from Ben Allgrove, a partner at Baker & McKenzie and a contributor to JIPLP. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 4:29 am
Panellists are Mr Justice Arnold, Chris Wadlow, Phillip Johnson and Birgit Clark. [read post]
25 May 2022, 8:06 am
StockX and Hermès v. [read post]
30 May 2011, 4:55 am
Patent 6,142,927 obvious: In re James Hoyt Clark (IPBiz) First Case applying Therasense from Eastern District of Texas – Motion for finding of inequitable conduct denied: Ameranth v. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 7:22 am
McKenzie, 341 N.J. [read post]
30 Nov 2007, 4:21 pm
(Hat tips: Clark Lindsey.)Speaking of COTS, this blog is not Space War Probe: But the third quarter issue of MilsatMagazine focuses on COTS business.Newspace and the "Netscape moment": Leonard David overviews things (Space News).V-Prize visions: Zip over to lawyer and great guy Jack Kennedy's Spaceports, for v-cool news on the V-Prize challenge. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 5:01 am
Not so very far away, Birgit Clark has just taken up her new position as a trade mark attorney in the London office of international law firm Baker & McKenzie. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 2:22 am
Osborne Clarke, TechMonitor, FinTech Times, Mishcon de Reya, DLA Piper, the Privacy and Information Law Blog and the Data Protection Report have more information. [read post]
5 Jul 2020, 4:37 pm
She refused the claimant permission for her McKenzie friend to make oral submissions on her behalf. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
McKenzie, No. 07-1834 Sentence of forty-two months' imprisonment for distribution of cocaine base is affirmed over claims of error that: 1) district court incorrectly assigned two points to her Criminal History Category (CHC) score, thus rendering her ineligible for safety-valve relief under 18 U.S.C. section 3553(f); and 2) district court improperly credited computerized docket reports showing her past convictions. [read post]
