Search for: "Clark v. Payne"
Results 1 - 20
of 27
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2023, 12:42 pm
Perry’s plan appeared to be succeeding, as Trump offered Clark the position of Acting Attorney General, Clark said he would accept, and the White House call logs referred to Clark under that new title. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 9:59 am
Clark v. [read post]
14 May 2019, 6:56 am
Breyer’s warning echoed Justice Thurgood Marshall’s 1991 dissent in Payne v. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 1:56 pm
Payne, et al. v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
Ellis v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 6:52 am
Journalist Lauren Collins interviewed editor Paul Dacre (“he still doesn’t have a computer in his office“) and Mail Online editor Martin Clarke. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 2:07 am
Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Payne & Anor, heard 4 November 2011. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 4:10 am
Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Payne & Anor, heard 4 November 2011. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 2:14 am
Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Payne & Anor, heard 4 November 2011. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 9:39 am
Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Payne & Anor, heard 4 November 2011. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 3:42 am
On Friday 4 November the matter of Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Payne & Anor will be heard in Courtroom 2 by Lady Hale and Lords Brown, Mance, Kerr and Wilson. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 2:54 am
Open justice Broadcasters will be allowed to film in courts for the first time, Justice Secretary Kenneth Clarke announced last week. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 1:14 pm
On August 4, 2011, the District of Columbia Court of Appeals decided Payne v. [read post]
13 May 2011, 10:28 pm
This summer Cymie Payne (left) will join Rutgers University at New Brunswick as Assistant Professor and Associate Faculty with the Rutgers law school at Camden. [read post]
9 May 2011, 8:21 am
In re Estate of Payne, 186 N.J. 324, 335 (2006); Fidelity Union Trust Co. v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 9:01 am
Payne, Andrew G. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 3:13 pm
” [Payne, supra, 186 N.J. at 335.] [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 5:09 am
In Payne v. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 12:34 pm
That conclusion, which, in our judgment, follows from the plain meaning of subsection (4), is supported by the authorities: see in particular Wilson v First County Trust Ltd [2001] QB 407, Watchtower Investments Ltd v Payne [2001] EWCA Civ 1159, [2001] GCCR 3055 and Wilson v Robertsons (London) Ltd [2005] EWHC 1425 (Ch), [2006] 1 WLR 1248. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 12:34 pm
That conclusion, which, in our judgment, follows from the plain meaning of subsection (4), is supported by the authorities: see in particular Wilson v First County Trust Ltd [2001] QB 407, Watchtower Investments Ltd v Payne [2001] EWCA Civ 1159, [2001] GCCR 3055 and Wilson v Robertsons (London) Ltd [2005] EWHC 1425 (Ch), [2006] 1 WLR 1248. [read post]
