Search for: "Clark v. STRAIN" Results 1 - 20 of 90
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Aug 2022, 7:10 pm by Bill Marler
MARLER of MARLER CLARK, LLP (pending admission pro hac vice), pursuant to MCR 2.118(A)(1), to allege and state as follows: I. [read post]
12 Dec 2018, 2:55 pm by Bill Marler
  The Wisconsin Supreme Court in Kriefall v Excel called it as it saw it: The E. coli strain that killed Brianna and made the others sick is a “deleterious substance which may render [meat] injurious to health. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 7:46 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Compare In re Pattullo, 271 F.3d 898 (9th Cir. 2001) (vacating where event determined to moot case occurred before appellate decision was rendered); Clarke v. [read post]
19 Oct 2021, 4:21 pm by INFORRM
On 12 October 2021, Oxford County Court handed down judgment in Fairhurst v Woodard (Case No: G00MK161). [read post]
16 Aug 2015, 9:33 am by Bill Marler
COLI O157:H7 BACTERIA Sources, Characteristics, and Identification E. coli O157:H7 is one of hundreds of strains of the bacterium Escherichia coli.[1] Most strains of E. coli are harmless and live as normal flora in the intestines of healthy humans and animals.[2] The E. coli bacterium is among the most extensively studied microorganism.[3] The combination of letters and numbers in the name of the E. coli O157:H7 refers to the specific markers found on its surface and distinguishes… [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 3:44 am by INFORRM
In this two-part post, Emma Linch explores the judgment in Banks v Cadwalladr. [read post]