Search for: "Clark v. STRAIN" Results 1 - 20 of 65
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Dec 2018, 2:55 pm by Bill Marler
  The Wisconsin Supreme Court in Kriefall v Excel called it as it saw it: The E. coli strain that killed Brianna and made the others sick is a “deleterious substance which may render [meat] injurious to health. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 7:46 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Compare In re Pattullo, 271 F.3d 898 (9th Cir. 2001) (vacating where event determined to moot case occurred before appellate decision was rendered); Clarke v. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 8:55 am by PaulKostro
Accordingly, “courts ’strain to give effect to the terms of a settlement wherever possible.’” [read post]
16 Aug 2015, 9:33 am by Bill Marler
COLI O157:H7 BACTERIA Sources, Characteristics, and Identification E. coli O157:H7 is one of hundreds of strains of the bacterium Escherichia coli.[1] Most strains of E. coli are harmless and live as normal flora in the intestines of healthy humans and animals.[2] The E. coli bacterium is among the most extensively studied microorganism.[3] The combination of letters and numbers in the name of the E. coli O157:H7 refers to the specific markers found on its surface and distinguishes… [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 1:56 am
The yoghurt case in question is Fage UK Ltd & Another v Chobani UK Ltd & Another [the decision of Briggs J at trial is at [2013] EWHC 630 (Ch), noted by the IPKat here; the appeal decision, at [2014] EWCA Civ 5, featuring Lords Justices Lewison, Kitchin and Longmore, is noted by the IPKat here]. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 4:42 am by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
Wasserman ("[T]his paper draws on novel patent-processing data and presents evidence suggesting that the PTO will attempt to maintain as much aggregate application throughput as it can during times of financial strain by prioritizing the examination of applications within those technologies that cost the PTO the least to review.")Enabling Patentless Innovation, by Clark D. [read post]
29 Nov 2020, 6:05 am by Anastasiia Kyrylenko
The three-step Coco v AN Clark test was applied to the dispute. [read post]
13 Feb 2015, 3:00 am by Katharine Alexander, Olswang LLP
The Supreme Court appeal On 13 January 2015, the appeal was heard before Lord Neuberger, Lord Mance, Lord Clarke, Lord Reed and Lord Toulson. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 1:41 am
Full article: Family Law Week.Prest v Petrodel Resources Limited 2013 UKSC 34 a victory for common sense"In summary, the Supreme Court (comprising Lords Neuberger, Walker, Mance, Clarke, Wilson, Sumption and Lady Hale) has unanimously upheld the wife’s appeal and found that the Respondent group of companies held the assets on trust for the Husband. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
O’Brien[v] might have been caused by his worry that aggressive judicial patrolling of congressional motivation or of incidental effects on speech would produce too many challenges and thus strain judicial capacity, as Coan posits, but it might instead have been the product of an aversion to non-linguistic anti-war protests, an aversion that would explain Warren’s dissent in Street v. [read post]