Search for: "Clark v. Settle" Results 1 - 20 of 465
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm by admin
The HSP authors settled on a definition of “first use” as any use of a PPA product within 24 hours, and no other uses in the previous two weeks.[13] Given the rapid onset of pressor and depressor effects, and adaptation response, this definition of first use was generous and likely included many irrelevant exposed cases, but at least the definition attempted to incorporate the phenomena of short-lived effect and adaption. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
 AP reports that New York City has agreed to settle the class action damage claim in Clark v. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 7:54 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
The opinion begins with reference to well-settled law that to constitute substantial evidence, a medical opinion must be based on reasonable medical probability ( McAllister v. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 3:38 am by INFORRM
A preliminary trial on meaning due to be heard last week has had to be relisted after actor Noel Clarke disinstructed his legal advisors shortly before the hearing. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 4:37 pm by INFORRM
And the privacy interests protected by that constitutional tort have been balanced against the public interest in freedom of expression at irish law in exactly the same way that they were balanced at all three levels in Bloomberg (here, the leading case is Cogley v RTÉ [2005] 4 IR 79, [2005] IEHC 180 (8 June 2005) (Clarke J); see also Herrity v Associated Newspapers [2009] 1 IR 316, [2008] IEHC 249 (18 July 2008)… [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 9:00 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Congress did just that in the Ethics in Government Act, but SCOTUS upheld the independent counsel in Morrison v. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 12:18 pm by Tim K. Garrett and Maja Hartzell
On May 19, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals issued its split opinion in Clark, et al. v. [read post]
22 May 2023, 9:53 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Historically, most settled on the Lusardi ad hoc approach (from the District of New Jersey’s 1987 decision in Lusardi v. [read post]