Search for: "Clark v. State Personnel Board"
Results 21 - 31
of 31
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Sep 2011, 4:07 am
After considering evidence about a conversation that husband purportedly had with one of its employees, the Office of Personnel Management affirmed, stating that husband could have elected to receive a reduced lifetime annuity with survivor benefits for a new wife only by notifying OPM of his intentions in a signed writing within two years of his marriage, 5 U.S.C. 8339(k)(2)(A). [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 3:05 pm
As we stated in State v. [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 12:50 pm
In Clark v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 10:57 am
At its February 25 meeting, the Board will consider reversing its adoption of the protocol pending a legally required review of environmental impacts to forests and the climate. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 7:16 pm
Click Here Sewerage and Water Board of New Orleans Agrees to Reinstate Program to Improve Sewage System Damaged by Hurricane Katrina. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 3:22 am
Colorado State Board of Agriculture, 2007 WL 2022061, *18 (D. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
Mitchell, No. 02-3505 Denial of a petition for habeas relief in a death penalty case is reversed where: 1) a state court applied the Strickland standard in an objectively unreasonable manner for purposes of claims that petitioner's counsel were ineffective in preparing for the sentencing phase of his trial; 2) the state court unreasonably determined that the alleged errors of trial counsel did not prejudice petitioner's case; and 3) a state court erroneously… [read post]
10 Nov 2007, 10:07 pm
United States District Court, 503 U.S. 653 (1992) .................................................4 Gregg v. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 9:44 pm
A high degree of medical skill would be needed to ensure avoidance of this outcome.The involvement of health personnel in executions. [read post]
22 May 2007, 2:29 pm
Rasmussen, "The Story of Case v. [read post]
11 Apr 2007, 11:55 pm
The Eighth Circuit has suggested that a claim would lie if a plaintiff established that a record " would be available to prospective employers," Clark v. [read post]
