Search for: "Clark v. United States" Results 61 - 80 of 1,128
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jun 2011, 11:15 am by Roy Ginsburg
Whiting By: Ben Weeks and Marilyn Clark On May 26, 2011, the Supreme Court issued its decision in Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 1:00 am by Guy Stuckey-Clarke, Olswang LLP
In the aftermath of the Cuban missile crisis, the United States identified Diego Garcia as a suitable location for a military base in the Indian Ocean. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 4:52 am by Moll Law Group
Earlier this month, the United States Supreme Court decided a case that may have a major effect on nursing home claims throughout the United States. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 11:34 pm by Gilles Cuniberti
Related posts:New Alien Tort Statute Case At The United States Supreme Court: Kiobel, et al., v Royal Dutch Petroleum Petition Filed In Kiobel, et al., v Royal Dutch Petroleum, et al.,... [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 7:16 am
Appellant was returned to the United States in custody and, although previously had been voluntarily in the United States, he was not "found in" the US at that point. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 5:00 am by Beck, et al.
As we said last week, because it’s a Dechert case, we can’t comment directly on Clark v. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 6:29 am by Steven Cohen
Kimberly-Clark Global Sales, et. al – United States District Court – Middle District of Pennsylvania – January 30th, 2018) involves injuries sustained by a truck driver when cargo fell on him after he opened the doors of a trailer he was hauling. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 5:46 am by Susan Brenner
This judge began his analysis of the motion by noting that to “`“state a claim under § 1983, a plaintiff must allege two essential elements: (1) that a right secured by the Constitution or laws of the United States was violated, and (2) that the alleged violation was committed by a person acting under the color of State law. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 5:15 am
  United States law uses the exclusionary ruleto enforce the requirements of the 4th Amendment, which means evidence obtained by actions that violate the 4th Amendment cannot be used against the person whose property was searched in a criminal prosecution unless. . . . [read post]