Search for: "Clarke v. Russell" Results 1 - 20 of 135
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jul 2022, 12:47 am by Frank Cranmer
Russell Sandberg summarises the judgment and comments here. [read post]
16 Aug 2021, 11:57 am by Amy Howe
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose lawyers contribute to SCOTUSblog in various capacities, is counsel to the respondents in this case.] [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 1:39 pm by Giles Peaker
The right to move an occupier from one room to another is inconsistent with exclusive possession (see Westminster City Council v Clarke (1992) 2 AC 288). [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 2:07 pm
His Honour Judge Hacon has referred to the CJEU two important questions of unregistered Community design (UCD) law.In Beverly Hills Teddy Bear Company v PMS International Group plc [2019] EWHC 2419 (IPEC), the Claimant (BHTB) seeks to enforce its registered Community designs, UCDs and copyright in design drawings in six soft toys called “Squeezamals” [which are seemingly very popular; readers with small children may be better placed to comment]. [read post]
27 Jan 2019, 4:19 pm by INFORRM
Women and AI: Harms, Impacts and Remedies, Information Law and Policy Centre, 17 Russell Square, London WC1B 5DR, 7 March 2019, 17.00 to 19.00. [read post]
7 Nov 2018, 8:46 am by John Elwood
Clark; and must be accompanied by “a detailed explanation based on the record,” Clemons v. [read post]
27 Jul 2018, 6:00 am
Callahan, Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP, on Friday, July 20, 2018 Tags: Janus Capital v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 3:31 am by Edith Roberts
At The George Washington Law Review’s On the Docket blog, Donald Clarke looks at Animal Science Products v. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 12:23 am by admin
” The Ohio Supreme Court reviewed the sudden medical emergency defense in the case of Roman v. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 12:23 am by admin
” The Ohio Supreme Court reviewed the sudden medical emergency defense in the case of Roman v. [read post]
27 Jan 2018, 6:43 am by William Ford
United States or permitted by its ruling in Munaf v. [read post]