Search for: "Clarke v. Russell" Results 81 - 100 of 135
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Mar 2009, 10:56 am
Opinion below   (7th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Reply brief for petitioner Docket: 08-673 Title: Clark v. [read post]
27 Jul 2018, 6:00 am
Callahan, Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP, on Friday, July 20, 2018 Tags: Janus Capital v. [read post]
2 Jul 2017, 2:23 am
Sensory copyright finally makes its way to CJEU | Big Data, products & processes: being a German patentee in the era of the Rezeptortyrosinkinase decisions | Life as an IP Lawyer: Singapore | Appointed Person issues first appeal decision in a design case | The meaning of "red carpet" in two and three dimensions: from Ancient Greece to Cannes | Judge Alsup driving forward Uber-Waymo trade secret dispute amongst "red flag" disclosure hearings | Monday Miscellany | Friday… [read post]
1 Jul 2017, 12:00 am
Sensory copyright finally makes its way to CJEU | Big Data, products & processes: being a German patentee in the era of the Rezeptortyrosinkinase decisions | Life as an IP Lawyer: Singapore | Appointed Person issues first appeal decision in a design case | The meaning of "red carpet" in two and three dimensions: from Ancient Greece to Cannes | Judge Alsup driving forward Uber-Waymo trade secret dispute amongst "red flag" disclosure hearings | Monday Miscellany | Friday… [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 2:07 pm
His Honour Judge Hacon has referred to the CJEU two important questions of unregistered Community design (UCD) law.In Beverly Hills Teddy Bear Company v PMS International Group plc [2019] EWHC 2419 (IPEC), the Claimant (BHTB) seeks to enforce its registered Community designs, UCDs and copyright in design drawings in six soft toys called “Squeezamals” [which are seemingly very popular; readers with small children may be better placed to comment]. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 12:00 pm by Mary Pat Dwyer
  Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
7 Nov 2018, 8:46 am by John Elwood
Clark; and must be accompanied by “a detailed explanation based on the record,” Clemons v. [read post]
27 Jan 2019, 4:19 pm by INFORRM
Women and AI: Harms, Impacts and Remedies, Information Law and Policy Centre, 17 Russell Square, London WC1B 5DR, 7 March 2019, 17.00 to 19.00. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 2:46 pm
(Disclosure: Howe & Russell co-represents the respondent.) [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 5:19 pm
Opinion below (6th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Docket: 08-1122 Title: Clark, et al. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 3:30 am by INFORRM
On 13 March, Julian Huppert MP asked the justice secretary Kenneth Clarke about protection for academics and scientists in its draft defamation bill. [read post]
10 Jul 2022, 12:47 am by Frank Cranmer
Russell Sandberg summarises the judgment and comments here. [read post]
13 Dec 2006, 7:17 pm
Clark, Drew Clark, Michael B. [read post]
7 May 2012, 4:18 am by INFORRM
David Cameron, Nick Clegg, George Osborne, Jeremy Hunt, Kenneth Clarke, Theresa May, Michael Gove, and Vince Cable, will be collectively known as “Government Core Participants”. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 12:31 am by INFORRM
On the same day Tugendhat J heard an application for permission to amend in the case of Modi v Clarke. [read post]