Search for: "Clarke v. Russell"
Results 81 - 100
of 130
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Sep 2019, 2:07 pm
His Honour Judge Hacon has referred to the CJEU two important questions of unregistered Community design (UCD) law.In Beverly Hills Teddy Bear Company v PMS International Group plc [2019] EWHC 2419 (IPEC), the Claimant (BHTB) seeks to enforce its registered Community designs, UCDs and copyright in design drawings in six soft toys called “Squeezamals” [which are seemingly very popular; readers with small children may be better placed to comment]. [read post]
2 Jul 2017, 2:23 am
Sensory copyright finally makes its way to CJEU | Big Data, products & processes: being a German patentee in the era of the Rezeptortyrosinkinase decisions | Life as an IP Lawyer: Singapore | Appointed Person issues first appeal decision in a design case | The meaning of "red carpet" in two and three dimensions: from Ancient Greece to Cannes | Judge Alsup driving forward Uber-Waymo trade secret dispute amongst "red flag" disclosure hearings | Monday Miscellany | Friday… [read post]
1 Jul 2017, 12:00 am
Sensory copyright finally makes its way to CJEU | Big Data, products & processes: being a German patentee in the era of the Rezeptortyrosinkinase decisions | Life as an IP Lawyer: Singapore | Appointed Person issues first appeal decision in a design case | The meaning of "red carpet" in two and three dimensions: from Ancient Greece to Cannes | Judge Alsup driving forward Uber-Waymo trade secret dispute amongst "red flag" disclosure hearings | Monday Miscellany | Friday… [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 9:00 pm
Clarke School of Law This year, the program is taking a team-based approach, with each team of three students taking on one of five projects aimed at the elimination of systemic racism and the creation of greater equity and accessibility in the U.S. legal system. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 12:00 pm
Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
7 Nov 2018, 8:46 am
Clark; and must be accompanied by “a detailed explanation based on the record,” Clemons v. [read post]
27 Jan 2019, 4:19 pm
Women and AI: Harms, Impacts and Remedies, Information Law and Policy Centre, 17 Russell Square, London WC1B 5DR, 7 March 2019, 17.00 to 19.00. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 12:45 pm
In Walker v. [read post]
25 Sep 2009, 10:06 pm
See Crazy Horse Too A Gentleman's Club v. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 2:46 pm
(Disclosure: Howe & Russell co-represents the respondent.) [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 5:19 pm
Opinion below (6th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Docket: 08-1122 Title: Clark, et al. v. [read post]
10 Apr 2010, 9:48 pm
Clarke, 2003 BCCA 670, 22 B.C.L.R. (4th) 1 at para. 62. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 6:20 pm
Clark, “The Union of Law and Equity,”[2] 25 Columbia Law Review 1-10 (1925)· P.S. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 3:30 am
On 13 March, Julian Huppert MP asked the justice secretary Kenneth Clarke about protection for academics and scientists in its draft defamation bill. [read post]
10 Jul 2022, 12:47 am
Russell Sandberg summarises the judgment and comments here. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 1:02 am
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia The ABC has reversed a decision to drop its public interest defence of a defamation suit brought by former commando Heston Russell, during a day of legal argument labelled “farcical” by a federal court judge. [read post]
13 Dec 2006, 7:17 pm
Clark, Drew Clark, Michael B. [read post]
7 May 2012, 4:18 am
David Cameron, Nick Clegg, George Osborne, Jeremy Hunt, Kenneth Clarke, Theresa May, Michael Gove, and Vince Cable, will be collectively known as “Government Core Participants”. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 2:56 am
On the same day, there were hearings in the cases of 2 Wakefield Limited v Persons Unknown, Clarke v Rose and Wolverhampton City Council v Kevin Poole. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 12:31 am
On the same day Tugendhat J heard an application for permission to amend in the case of Modi v Clarke. [read post]
