Search for: "Class v. United States" Results 41 - 60 of 9,026
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
  As luck would have it, the United States District Court for the Central District of California has afforded us an opportunity to address both issues in a single, connected article. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 7:43 am by Orin Kerr
(Orin Kerr) I’m about to head off to teach an 11am class about the reasonable expectation of privacy test, using the case of United States v. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 6:27 am by Amy Howe
Petitioners next invoke what they describe as “the general rule of nonparty preclusion . . . grounded in the United States Constitution” and its due process requirements.  [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 7:11 am by Kali Borkoski
United States ,” which will lead you to all the posts. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 9:16 pm by Brian Wolfman
In other words, courts in the United States offer no data on such basic questions as the number of cases filed as class actions, the percentage of cases designated as class actions that are eventually certified as such, or the ultimate disposition of such cases. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 12:56 pm by Peter Breslauer
Ct. 1426 (2013), was one of the most important recent class certification opinions of the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
24 Dec 2016, 6:47 pm by
  On June 20, 2011, the United States Supreme Court reversed a Class Certification order in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 4:34 pm by Jane Chong
United States, in an attempt to overturn his military commission conviction for conspiracy to commit war crimes. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 6:39 pm by Mike Gottlieb
United States, which today resolved a decade-old controversy regarding the constitutional distinction between two kinds of sentences: mandatory minimums and statutory maximums. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 11:09 am by Paul Karlsgodt
In the first of four highly anticipated rulings on class action issues this term, the United States Supreme Court has handed down a major victory for business interests.  [read post]