Search for: "Clawson v. United States" Results 1 - 4 of 4
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Apr 2019, 4:14 pm by INFORRM
Nor does it preclude the possibility that specialised units would be more effective. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 8:41 am by Cyberleagle
Nor does it preclude the possibility that specialised units would be more effective. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 3:57 pm by Wolfgang Demino
§ 1692a(6).In Henson, the United States Supreme Court specified that it would only determine whether the defendant was a debt collector pursuant to the second definition of section 1692a(6), i.e., whether the "statutory language defining the term `debt collector' [] embrace[s] anyone who `regularly collects or attempts to collect . . . debts owed or due . . . another.'" 137 S. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 3:41 pm
Nor had the Supreme Court yet ruled in United State v. [read post]