Search for: "Clements v. State"
Results 241 - 260
of 723
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Mar 2017, 8:16 am
See United States v. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 11:51 am
” The case of Martinez-Hidalgo v. [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 3:29 am
.), administrative law (Eugene Scalia, same, at 4:25+), and statutory interpretation (Paul Clement, same, at 36:15); and see earlier on my question at the telecommunications panel; “Can States Forcibly Unionize Small Businesses? [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 7:37 am
That a simplified version of the P&I Clause but the point is that it ensures "the citizens of the United States [are] one people, by placing the citizens of each State upon the same footing with citizens of other States," even if people in those other states elect someone that we despise to the White House.The case is Clement v. [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 3:16 am
” In an op-ed in the Denver Post, Joseph Smith Jr. weighs in on Endrew F. v. [read post]
1 Jan 2017, 8:58 pm
Clements was entitled to a new trial (see Clements v. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 11:03 am
Clements v. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 3:41 am
Virginia State Board of Elections and McCrory v. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 7:42 pm
Virginia State Board of Elections and McCrory v. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 1:53 pm
Of course, that time period was shared largely by a Republican-appointed solicitor general (Paul Clement) and a Democratic-appointed solicitor general (Elena Kagan). [read post]
20 Nov 2016, 6:50 pm
The court cited Moore v. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 10:47 am
G.G., immigration regulation in United States v. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 1:22 pm
In San Clemente Estates v. [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 6:44 am
Virginia State Board of Elections and McCrory v. [read post]
17 Sep 2016, 5:08 pm
United States v. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 5:56 am
At the Notice and Comment blog, David Feder discusses Esquivel-Quintana v. [read post]
13 Sep 2016, 6:27 am
” In The Atlantic, Garrett Epps discusses next Term’s double jeopardy case Bravo-Fernandez v. [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 12:33 pm
Church & Dwight Co. v. [read post]
10 Sep 2016, 4:00 am
Clement v. [read post]
2 Sep 2016, 7:30 am
For his Election Law Blog, Rick Hasen suggests that Paul Clement wrote the brief for North Carolina “as if there were still a five Justice conservative majority on the Court,” despite foreseeing a defeat by this approach, so that Clement and the state “could paint the loss as caused by the ‘liberal Justices. [read post]
