Search for: "Clements v. State" Results 21 - 40 of 635
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jun 2019, 4:00 am by Administrator
This falls far short of meeting the “but for” test for causation (Clements v Clements, [2012] 2 SCR 181, 2012 SCC 32 (CanLII)). [read post]
17 May 2019, 3:44 am by Edith Roberts
At the Cato Institute’s Cato at Liberty blog, Ilya Shapiro and Matthew Larosiere weigh in on New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. [read post]
14 May 2019, 7:29 am by Andrew Hamm
Nixon doubled down on the Southern Strategy during the general election, capturing six southern states compared to one for Democrat Hubert Humphrey. [read post]
13 May 2019, 4:06 am by Edith Roberts
At CNN, Joan Biskupic explains that “[w]hat happens in [June Medical Services v. [read post]
2 May 2019, 5:42 am by Charles Sartain
The Bill is in response to the 2018 ruling of the Supreme Court of Texas in ConocoPhillips Company et al v. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 1:07 am by Kevin LaCroix
Peter Selvin Ben Clements In the following guest post, Peter Selvin and Ben Clements take a look at the legal principles involved in the allocation of defense expense under a D&O insurance policy. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 7:01 pm by Andrew Siegel
On Tuesday, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Parker Drilling Management Service, Ltd. v. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 4:26 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Clement v Londa, 8 AD3d 89, 90 [1st Dept 2004); see Kai Lin v Department of Dentistry, Univ. of Rochester Med. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 6:33 am by Xi Lucy Shi
Clement argued that in the court’s fist opinion, it referred to the House of Delegates as “the State,” and “the House of Delegates were representing the State with the acquiescence of the State attorney general. [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 9:00 pm by DONALD SCARINCI
Facts of New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v City of New York New York City prohibits city residents from possessing a handgun without a license. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 12:10 pm by Matthew Davie
These are Department for Education v Information Commissioner & Whitmey [2018] UKUT 348 and Cabinet Office v Information Commissioner & Webber [2018] UKUT 410. [read post]