Search for: "Clements v. State" Results 81 - 100 of 636
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Mar 2019, 6:33 am by Xi Lucy Shi
Clement argued that in the court’s fist opinion, it referred to the House of Delegates as “the State,” and “the House of Delegates were representing the State with the acquiescence of the State attorney general. [read post]
1 May 2012, 6:35 am by Nabiha Syed
United States, in which it will consider the scope of its 2010 decision in Padilla v. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 1:07 am by Kevin LaCroix
Peter Selvin Ben Clements In the following guest post, Peter Selvin and Ben Clements take a look at the legal principles involved in the allocation of defense expense under a D&O insurance policy. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 9:30 pm
Perhaps after the Court grants, Paul Clement will be enlisted to go down swinging. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 1:59 pm
But the Court did agree to give Solicitor General Paul Clement 15 minutes to argue, in addition to the 30 minutes for each side in the case. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 8:12 am by Nabiha Syed
At PrawfsBlawg, Michael Mannheimer asks how professors should teach United States v. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 2:14 pm by Rick Hasen
These briefs (lead author Paul Clement) are exceptionally well done and clear.  [read post]
18 Jan 2008, 1:04 pm
[The Rhode Island Supreme Court case cited in the briefs is State of Rhode Island v. [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 11:48 am by Dana M. Douglas and Jonathan J. Fox
  Prior to the amendment of the petitions, Judge Clement sustained Defendants’ Exceptions of Vagueness in the two cases, namely: The Parish of Plaquemines v. [read post]
29 Nov 2015, 9:34 pm by Lyle Denniston
Forty other states plus the Multistate Tax Commission supported Supreme Court review of the Nevada v. [read post]
13 May 2014, 10:17 am by Abbott & Kindermann
Such a claim led to a successful claim for damages against the City of San Clemente in Avenida San Juan Partnership v. [read post]
12 Sep 2017, 7:12 am
Yahoo brought multiple counterclaims, alleging, among other things, that SCA breached a previous agreement’s confidentiality provision as well as the contract’s requirement to obtain risk coverage,” the court's decision states.Before ruling on the matter, Clement wrote that based on McLane Foodservice Inc. v. [read post]