Search for: "Clements v. State" Results 121 - 140 of 813
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2012, 9:29 am by jleaming@acslaw.org
This post is part of an ACSblog online symposium on oral argument in HHS v. [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 11:48 am by Jonathan J. Fox and Liskow & Lewis
  Prior to the amendment of the petitions, Judge Clement sustained Defendants’ Exceptions of Vagueness in the two cases, namely: The Parish of Plaquemines v. [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 11:48 am by Dana M. Douglas and Jonathan J. Fox
  Prior to the amendment of the petitions, Judge Clement sustained Defendants’ Exceptions of Vagueness in the two cases, namely: The Parish of Plaquemines v. [read post]
29 Nov 2015, 9:34 pm by Lyle Denniston
Forty other states plus the Multistate Tax Commission supported Supreme Court review of the Nevada v. [read post]
13 May 2014, 10:17 am by Abbott & Kindermann
Such a claim led to a successful claim for damages against the City of San Clemente in Avenida San Juan Partnership v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 6:35 am by Nabiha Syed
United States, in which it will consider the scope of its 2010 decision in Padilla v. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 11:59 am by Amy Howe
Before Tuesday’s oral arguments in American Broadcasting Companies v. [read post]
17 May 2019, 3:44 am by Edith Roberts
At the Cato Institute’s Cato at Liberty blog, Ilya Shapiro and Matthew Larosiere weigh in on New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 5:55 pm
The Supreme Court has granted a petition, signed by the Solicitor General and several high-profile lawyers in the US Departments of State, Commerce, and Energy, to review the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit's decision United States v. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 12:56 pm by Gerard N. Magliocca
 (Paul Clement, arguing for Bond, said that Missouri v. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 11:47 am
Babbage Holdings, Inc., Case IPR2014-00954 (Clements) (August 22, 2014), Paper 17. [read post]
28 Sep 2007, 6:52 am
Clement filed an amicus brief with the United States Supreme Court siding with non-issuer defendants in a securities class action case. [read post]