Search for: "Clifton v. United States" Results 21 - 40 of 172
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Apr 2014, 9:53 am by Charles Abut
"    We note that the order precludes removal of the child from the United States, not from the State of New Jersey. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 1:07 pm
 Judge Clifton begins the thing with a nice little summary:"It is a crime to produce outside the United States a visual depiction of a minor engaged in sexually explicit conduct and to then transport that visual depiction into the United States. 18 U.S.C. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 6:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
  The article begins with a quote from United States Supreme Court Chief Justice Warren E. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 6:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
  The article begins with a quote from United States Supreme Court Chief Justice Warren E. [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 8:00 am by Steven G. Pearl
United States Steel Corp., ___ U.S. ___ (1/27/14), the Supreme Court of the United States considered the meaning of the phrase "changing clothes" in the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). 29 U.S.C. section 201 et seq. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 10:52 am by Viking
ACCA decided United States v. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 1:48 pm by Jon Sands
[Ed. note -- Jon asked me to step in for a few days while he's out of the office.]United States v. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 3:39 pm by Josh Blackman
” (To support the nationwide injunction, Washington argued that immigration law had to be uniform; ironically, the state had opposed this exact argument in United States v. [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 2:19 pm
Judge Clifton authors the opinion and holds that, no, the exclusionary rule indeed applies here because even though there may have been a violation of state law, that's not what the warrant was based on: a state judge issues warrants for state violations, and for that, the warrant here was improper. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 9:50 am by Evidence ProfBlogger
As I have noted before, New Mexico is the only United States jurisdiction that makes polygraph evidence presumptively admissible barring a prior stipulation by the parties. [read post]
13 Feb 2019, 3:32 pm
Szonyi is formally a citizen of Hungary (who came to the United States in 1957, when he was four years old), even though he's been in the United States for over 60 years, that means he's subject to deportation. [read post]