Search for: "Clinton Strange"
Results 81 - 100
of 478
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Oct 2018, 1:24 pm
How do you know they didn't vote because they hate abortion or because they wanted better trade deals or they don't trust the Clintons or, hell, maybe they still held out some insane hope of making America great again? [read post]
21 Sep 2018, 1:46 pm
But the story is strangely sourced to people “briefed either on the events themselves or on memos written by F.B.I. officials, including Andrew G. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 3:06 am
This is why becoming a judge at the moment is a ridiculous bearing of your soul to a strange, rabid beast of mob justice. [read post]
16 Sep 2018, 9:01 pm
Bob Woodward, Fear: Trump in the White House (Simon & Schuster, 2018)Judging from the initial buzz, Bob Woodward’s Fear: Trump in the White House has all the makings of a publishing blockbuster. [read post]
18 Aug 2018, 12:58 pm
(It was, Papadopoulos said, “a very strange coincidence” to be informed of the “dirt” before his association with the campaign.) [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 9:51 am
Judge James Dennis was appointed to the Fifth Circuit by President Clinton. [read post]
17 Jun 2018, 4:00 am
Consider advertising revenue in this context: In trying to explain why “Why Readers See the Times as Liberal,” Liz Spayd, then the Times’s public editor (a position the Times, strangely, eliminated in 2017), noted the “drumbeat of Hillary Clinton campaign ads on the website. [read post]
16 Jun 2018, 6:32 am
Second, some time ago I wrote quite critically of Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein's memorandum in support of FBI Director James Comey's dismissal, calling it strangely inadequate. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 4:30 am
President Trump has been merciful lately. [read post]
29 May 2018, 9:37 am
One of my earliest Washington Post columns, back during the Starr-Clinton wars, argued that commentators should not kid themselves that leaks are good, just because they are good for the press. [read post]
8 May 2018, 9:50 am
Nixon and Clinton v. [read post]
3 May 2018, 1:50 pm
And it is related to the norm that former FBI Director Jim Comey grappled with concerning the investigation of Hillary Clinton and her email server: Comey’s decision to explain the FBI’s reasoning on the case cut against the principle that law enforcement should not broadcast the conduct of a private citizen against whom charges will not be brought. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 4:00 am
He even declined, when asked by the attorney general, to inform her of the content of his recommendation in the Clinton investigation. [read post]
22 Apr 2018, 4:41 pm
He notes that Amici seeking the Special Prosecutor were counsel for President Trump’s opponent, Hilary Clinton. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 1:48 pm
The post Alan Dershowitz Peddling Strange Theory in Support of Trump appeared first on . [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 9:01 pm
Bumble & Bumble (2005), a panel of the same court reaffirmed that Title VII does not protect against sexual orientation discrimination and upheld the dismissal of a claim by a lesbian woman because she could not show that the discrimination was based purely on her failure to live up to standards of femininity rather than because she was a lesbian.During the decades when federal courts were simply unwilling to interpret Title VII in a way that protected LGBT employees, some stop-gap measures were… [read post]
18 Feb 2018, 11:12 am
Last week Israeli police officials recommended that state prosecutors indict Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on a variety of corruption charges. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 7:20 am
Trump has also contributed to the GOP's massive shift away from fiscal conservatism towards spending even more money than Hillary Clinton envisioned in her 2016 campaign policy agenda. [read post]
9 Feb 2018, 8:37 pm
” To make a long story very short, the Supreme Court held in a 5-4 decision that the Clinton Administration was barred from using “sampling” techniques to achieve a more scientifically accurate count. [read post]
9 Feb 2018, 8:37 pm
” To make a long story very short, the Supreme Court held in a 5-4 decision that the Clinton Administration was barred from using “sampling” techniques to achieve a more scientifically accurate count. [read post]
