Search for: "Clinton v. Jones" Results 81 - 100 of 251
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 May 2019, 12:59 pm by Ilya Somin
Jones, which holds that the president is subject to civil lawsuits (thereby allowing Paula Jones to proceed with her sexual harassment case against then-President Bill Clinton). [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 6:52 am by fvanloon
In discussing a meeting with the potential source for a Mother Jones article accusing the Trump campaign of taking money from a Russian-American oil magnate, as well as Christopher Steele’s connection to that source, Kavalec emails Ohr citing the accusatory Mother Jones article. [read post]
11 May 2010, 7:30 pm by Anna Christensen
At the Los Angeles Times, James Oliphant moves on to Kagan’s career in the Clinton White House, and the Huffington Post points out that she urged then-President Clinton to approve a ban on late-term abortions in 1997. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 7:01 am by Joshua Matz
The Hill discusses some of the amicus briefs filed recently in support of respondent Antoine Jones in United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2009, 10:51 pm
  Starting right about 18 years ago, when Congress and President Clinton did the opposite. [read post]
17 May 2007, 4:20 pm
Does Jones v Clinton shed any light on this, considering the Jones suit was for alleged acts when Clinton was not President? [read post]
13 Feb 2011, 7:36 am by Marc DeGirolami
Yet that is precisely what the court did by a 9-to-0 vote in the 1997 case of Clinton v. [read post]
13 Jul 2019, 1:05 pm by Vishnu Kannan, Margaret Taylor
  Judge Tatel indicates his view that this case is closer to Clinton v. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 8:55 am by Orin France
The judge held that based on the US Supreme Court ruling in Clinton v. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 2:25 pm by fvanloon
The lawsuit led directly to the disclosure of Clinton’s email use (Judicial Watch v. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 1:56 pm by Kevin
That premise seems just slightly undermined by Clinton v. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 8:34 am by Fabrizio di Piazza
” Arguing the line-item veto case as Solicitor General immediately after the Supreme Court announced Clinton v. [read post]
6 Mar 2010, 7:34 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Jones Co., 776 F.2d 1522, 1530 (Fed. [read post]