Search for: "Close v. U. S" Results 341 - 360 of 1,876
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Mar 2021, 8:00 am by Robert Kreisman
Rowland applied the Illinois “sufficiently close relationship test,” rejecting Aim’s argument as “overly technical. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 5:13 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
Reed, Morse v LoveLive TV US, Inc., 2020 NY Slip Op 51481(U) [Sup Ct, NY County Dec. 15, 2020], considered Darcy‘s concept of “informal dissolution” and its implications for individual controller liability. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 3:35 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
People v Austin  2021 NY Slip Op 30276(U) January 29, 2021 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 451533/2019 Judge: O. [read post]
7 Mar 2021, 4:34 pm by INFORRM
Last Week in the Courts On 1 March 2021 Nicklin J heard closing submissions in the case of Lachaux v Independent Print. [read post]
2 Feb 2021, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Garrow’s 981-page Liberty and Sexuality: The Right to Privacy and the Making of Roe v. [read post]
29 Jan 2021, 3:37 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Trundle v Garr Silpe, P.C. 2020 NY Slip Op 34233(U) December 18, 2020 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 159437/2019 Judge: Lucy Billings is an example of big-number financial transactions and the potential culpability for large losses. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 5:33 pm by Jacob Sapochnick
Most recently K visa applicants expressed their frustrations by filing a class action lawsuit known as Milligan v. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 11:23 am by Dennis Boyle
Attorney for the Southern District of New York filed a Motion in Limine in the case of United States v. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 11:23 am by Dennis Boyle
Attorney for the Southern District of New York filed a Motion in Limine in the case of United States v. [read post]
,” Caltrans filed a Notice of Exemption (“NOE”) on June 30, 2017, prior to the close of the FEIR review period. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 4:46 am by Peter Mahler
Now there’s a fourth, Bak v Rostek, 2020 NY Slip Op 33142(U) [Sup Ct Kings County Sept. 25, 2020], in which a 47.5% member of a single-asset realty-holding LLC sold his membership interest to the other 52.5% member for around $900,000 based on a $1.9 million valuation assigned by the buying member. [read post]