Search for: "Close v. U. S"
Results 61 - 80
of 1,874
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Sep 2023, 9:18 am
So we err on the side of leniency toward the bar in close cases. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 4:21 am
Slip Op. 31190[U], 15 [New York County 2016]). [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court’s recent ruling in Sackett v. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 8:25 pm
Supreme Court’s recent ruling in Sackett v. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 2:12 pm
Truck Drivers Union Local No. 413 v. [read post]
28 Aug 2023, 6:35 am
Kadah v Kadah 2023 NY Slip Op 32889(U) August 18, 2023 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 152026/2022 Judge: Richard Latin has an excellent discussion of how privity of contract, a general requirement in legal malpractice claims, can apply both individually and when the law firm is representing a person as an entity, in this case, as administrator of an estate. [read post]
28 Aug 2023, 4:59 am
So what are the limits on its power to hear close ownership disputes? [read post]
17 Aug 2023, 1:02 pm
____ (2022), National Federation of Independent Business v. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 6:48 am
Massachusetts, 197 U. [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 4:40 am
” Third, the Court held: [T]he court cannot determine as a matter of law that it was improper for Kessler to counterclaim against Pascal individually, particularly because JJS is a closely held corporation and its interests are tied closely with Pascal’s own interests (see Conant v Schnall, 33 AD2d 326, 328 [3d Dept 1970] [citing general rule that a ‘shareholder bringing a derivative action is not subject to counterclaims against him… [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 8:59 am
In Biden v. [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 7:22 am
” Boozer v. [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 8:55 am
" The following passage from Justice Holmes's dissent in Eisner v. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 8:46 am
Tershakovec v. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 8:32 am
In Yegiazaryan v. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm
In Groff v. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 4:09 pm
The Supreme Court decided the closely watched jurisdictional case, Mallory v. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 9:08 am
It was also stipulated that the websites she plans to create “will be expressive in nature,” and “customized and tailored” through close collaboration with individual couples — and that Smith does not seek to sell an “ordinary commercial good but intends to create ‘customized and tailored’ speech for each couple. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 3:51 am
In Chewy v. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 10:59 am
Supreme Court in Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. [read post]
