Search for: "Close v. U. S" Results 101 - 120 of 1,815
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jun 2017, 1:15 pm by Stephanie M. Batchelder
Batchelder In a groundbreaking decision that follows closely on the heels of its jurisdictional decision in BNSF Railway Co. v. [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 4:42 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Quadrozzi v Castro  2019 NY Slip Op 30550(U)  March 5, 2019  Supreme Court, New York  County Docket Number: 151675/2018 Judge: Frank P. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 12:00 pm by Andy Wang
She had gone to the marathon with her close friend Krystle Campbell who, as explained above, was one of the fatalities. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 3:00 am by Glen C. Hansen
Glen’s blog article on the Knick case is located here: https://blog.aklandlaw.com/2019/10/articles/local-government/whistling-past-ms-knicks-graveyard-the-unstated-but-possible-consequences-of-the-u-s-supreme-courts-takings-decision-in-knick-v-township-of-scott-pennsylvania/ We look forward to this virtual meet and greet! [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 3:06 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  This simple fact renders Claude v Elgammal  ;2011 NY Slip Op 50024(U) ; Decided on January 14, 2011 ; Supreme Court, Kings County ; Battaglia, J. all the more shocking. [read post]
30 Aug 2022, 9:28 am by Carlos Kelly
In the case, Orlando Bar Group, LLC d/b/a The Basement, The Attic and the Treehouse v. [read post]
24 Mar 2020, 10:00 pm
She serves as an advocate for her clients and believes that the best results come from working in close association with the U. [read post]
29 Jan 2021, 3:37 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Trundle v Garr Silpe, P.C. 2020 NY Slip Op 34233(U) December 18, 2020 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 159437/2019 Judge: Lucy Billings is an example of big-number financial transactions and the potential culpability for large losses. [read post]
6 May 2020, 6:07 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Karambelas v Cohen Goldstein, LLP  2020 NY Slip Op 30994(U) April 2, 2020 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 15163 demonstrates how the Court will examine the underlying case (sometimes to an extreme degree) in order to determine the “but for” issue. [read post]