Search for: "Close v. U. S" Results 101 - 120 of 1,908
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Sep 2023, 6:37 am
  Though there is somewhat tight control in Cuba itself (at least to the extent that the authorities care to press control--and that changes with weather conditions) Cuban authorities and Cuban people tend to also listen closely to the goings on in the exile community. [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 2:30 pm by Dennis Crouch
As the Sixth Circuit has stated, “[u]nlike information merely exchanged between the parties, ‘[t]he public has a strong interest in obtaining the information contained in the court record.'” See Shane Grp., Inc. v. [read post]
24 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
  The list of states that have enacted such legislation in 2023 includes Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Idaho, Indiana, Louisiana, Mississippi, Montana, North Dakota, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Tennessee, Utah, West Virginia, and Virginia—an additional 20 states have introduced bills that would regulate foreign ownership of real estate if enacted.[2] In this post, we discuss: The typical contours of state legislation relating to certain foreign real estate activities; The emerging trendline of… [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 4:34 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
As we wrote five years ago, under a very close set of facts – sibling majority general partners who wanted to sell the partnership’s sole real estate asset versus a lone sibling holdout who refused to sell – Justice [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 9:05 pm by Sri Medicherla
Supreme Court’s recent ruling in Sackett v. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 8:25 pm by Sri Medicherla
Supreme Court’s recent ruling in Sackett v. [read post]
28 Aug 2023, 6:35 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Kadah v Kadah 2023 NY Slip Op 32889(U) August 18, 2023 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 152026/2022 Judge: Richard Latin has an excellent discussion of how privity of contract, a general requirement in legal malpractice claims, can apply both individually and when the law firm is representing a person as an entity, in this case, as administrator of an estate. [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 4:40 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
” Third, the Court held: [T]he court cannot determine as a matter of law that it was improper for Kessler to counterclaim against Pascal individually, particularly because JJS is a closely held corporation and its interests are tied closely with Pascal’s own interests (see Conant v Schnall, 33 AD2d 326, 328 [3d Dept 1970] [citing general rule that a ‘shareholder bringing a derivative action is not subject to counterclaims against him… [read post]