Search for: "Close v. United States"
Results 1 - 20
of 13,927
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jul 2014, 5:00 pm
United States v. [read post]
7 May 2019, 6:25 am
United States v. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 6:08 pm
In United States v. [read post]
Scope of Consent to Search closed containers at issue in case before the United States Supreme Court
19 Jan 2018, 2:18 am
The United States Supreme Court is considering an appeal in the case of Gonzalez-Badillo v. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 5:57 am
Likely you've heard: The United States last week petitioned for the full Fourth Circuit to rehear United States v. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 11:47 am
In United States v. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 12:17 pm
The oral argument today in the closely watched Arizona v. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 4:21 pm
United States. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 8:51 am
United States. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 10:48 am
United States, 116 A.3d 894 (D.C. [read post]
13 Aug 2018, 12:29 pm
That may be too close to exile, since 8 U.S.C. 1185(b) makes it unlawful “for any citizen of the United States to depart from or enter, or attempt to depart from or enter, the United States unless he bears a valid United States passport. [read post]
16 Sep 2015, 1:30 am
On 15-16 July the Supreme Court heard the case of United States of America v Nolan regarding the respondent’s redundancy following the closure of her US military base, RSA Hythe. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 2:04 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 7:33 am
United States. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 12:29 pm
United States, 587 U. [read post]
11 Dec 2011, 5:43 am
United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2012, 7:10 pm
Slip op. at 4 N.1 (citing United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 6:27 am
The issue in United States v. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 3:12 pm
Judge Moore’s comprehensive opinion in United States v. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 7:50 am
The United States Supreme Court recently asked the solicitor general for the government's position on the case of Staub v. [read post]
