Search for: "Coccia v Liotti"
Results 1 - 7
of 7
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Feb 2010, 4:10 am
in Coccia v Liotti ;2010 NY Slip Op 00917 ; Decided on February 9, 2010 ; Appellate Division, Second Department we see some very unusual language from the Appellate Division. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 3:07 am
"An attorney who is discharged for cause, however, is not entitled to compensation or a lien" (Callaghan v Callaghan, 48 AD3d 500, 501; see Campagnola v Mulholland, Minion & Roe, 76 NY2d at 44; Coccia v Liotti, 70 AD3d at 757). [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 4:14 am
Furthermore, the defendants also failed to establish, prima facie, that had they perfected and prosecuted the appeal, the appeal would not have been successful (see Coccia v Liotti, 70 AD3d 747). [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 4:39 am
The allegation that Mid City lost the opportunity to pursue an administrative appeal, without any indication that the appeal would be successful, is insufficient to state a claim (see Coccia v Liotti, 70 AD3d 747, 754). [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 4:45 am
The plaintiffs’ allegations, inter alia, that Weiss failed to ascertain the status of the foreclosure action before recommending a strategy, and that his proposed strategy of focusing on the pursuit of a mortgage modification was “futile” in light of the then upcoming foreclosure auction, were sufficient, if true, for a factfinder to determine that Weiss offered negligent advice (see Esposito v Noto, 132 AD3d 944, 945-946; Coccia v Liotti,… [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 3:25 am
If it is alleged that an attorney’s alleged legal malpractice has prevented a plaintiff from commencing a timely appeal, then the defendant moving for summary judgment based on the absence of causation must affirmatively demonstrate that the plaintiff would not have prevailed in the appeal (see Coccia v Liotti, 70 AD3d 747; McCluskey v Gabor & Gabor, 61 AD3d 646). [read post]
14 May 2021, 3:34 am
Castro, 119 AD3d 920, 922 [2d Dept 2014]; Miazga v. [read post]
